The application, lodged under Article 3 of the Convention, concerns the domestic authorities’ allegedly inadequate response to the applicant’s medical needs while in detention,
CASE OF YOCHEVA AND GANEVA v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 18592/15 and 43863/15
The case concerns the applicants’ complaints of discrimination against them as single mothers caring for their minor children whose fathers are unknown, based on the refusal of the authorities to grant
CASE OF KILIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 10271/12
The present case concerns the applicant’s criminal conviction for public calls to violence and ethnic discord on account of video and audio files that had been made accessible via a social-network account.
CASE OF RID NOVAYA GAZETA AND ZAO NOVAYA GAZETA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 44561/11
The applicants alleged, in particular, that the caution procedure used against them under the anti-extremist legislation had amounted to an unlawful and disproportionate interference with their right to freedom
F.O. v. Croatia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 250 April 2021 F.O. v. Croatia – 29555/13 Judgment 22.4.2021 [Section I]
CASE OF YEVDOKIMOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 24635/14
The applicant complained about the failure to disclose to the defence the court decisions authorising covert surveillance measures against him and admission in evidence against him of the statements of attesting witnesses absent from the trial.
CASE OF POLTORATSKYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 11551/13
The case concerns the alleged lack of any genuine prospect of the applicant’s release in view of his life-imprisonment sentence (Article 3); the restrictions on his right to family visits during his sentence (Article 8);
CASE OF MORDVANYUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 1199/16
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint that the length of proceedings in his pension-related case was excessive and he had no effective domestic remedy in that respect, contrary to Articles
CASE OF KOVRIZHNYKH v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 28943/15
The applicant was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment in the judgment at first instance. Proceedings on appeal in his case were put on hold because the Ukrainian authorities no longer had access to the domestic case file.
CASE OF ILLYASHENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 8562/13
The case concerns the alleged unrecorded detention of the applicant, the justification for his pre-trial detention and the alleged absence of a meaningful review of the lawfulness of his detention,