INTRODUCTION. The case concerns alleged breaches of Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on account of the lack of adequate and sufficient reasoning in the domestic courts’
CASE OF ROMANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos.21080/09 and 3 others – see appended list
INTRODUCTION. The applications concern the alleged ill-treatment and death of the applicants’ relatives at the hands of State agents between 2007 and 2013 and the lack of an effective investigation thereof,
CASE OF Y.S. v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 28131/19
INTRODUCTION. The application concerns the applicant’s placement in a psychiatric facility for involuntary treatment. The applicant invokes Article 5 § 1 of the Convention.
CASE OF D.S. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 70988/12
INTRODUCTION. The application concerns the past disclosure of the applicant’s criminal record information and the amended disclosure regime which entered into force law after this Court’s judgment in M.M.
CASE OF THOMPSON v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 36048/17
INTRODUCTION. The present case concerns the decision of the Russian courts to refuse the first applicant’s request for the return of the second applicant to Spain under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects
CASE OF GASANGUSENOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 78019/17
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns the killing of the applicant’s two sons during a special operation carried out by State agents on 23 August 2016 in Goor‑Khindakh, Dagestan,
CASE OF M.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 51220/13
INTRODUCTION. The application concerns the past disclosure of the applicant’s criminal record information and the amended disclosure regime which entered into force after this Court’s judgment in M.M.
CASE OF RIBCHEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 37801/16 and 2 others
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns the questions whether the authorities were required by Article 2 of the Convention, and if so, in what form,
A.I. v. Italy (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 250 April 2021 A.I. v. Italy – 70896/17 Judgment 1.4.2021 [Section I]
CASE OF RUSANDU v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 23047/20
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF RUSANDU v. UKRAINE (Application no. 23047/20) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 April 2021