Information Note on the Court’s case-law 249 March 2021 Smiljanić v. Croatia – 35983/14 Judgment 25.3.2021 [Section I]
Stoimenovikj and Miloshevikj v. North Macedonia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 249 March 2021 Stoimenovikj and Miloshevikj v. North Macedonia – 59842/14 Judgment 25.3.2021 [Section V]
Bivolaru and Moldovan v. France (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 249 March 2021 Bivolaru and Moldovan v. France – 40324/16 and 12623/17 Judgment 25.3.2021 [Section V]
CASE OF AVRAIMOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 71818/17
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns the applicant’s complaints that the physical conditions of his detention in the Kyiv pre-trial detention centre were in breach of Article 3 of the Convention and that the Code of Criminal
CASE OF ALEKSANDROVSKAYA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 38718/16
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns the applicant’s complaints: under Article 3 of the Convention that she was placed in metal cages during court hearings; under Article 5 § 1 (c) that her arrest was unlawful;
CASE OF VALENTYN IVANOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 9021/11
INTRODUCTION. The present case concerns a failure of the national courts to address a specific and pertinent argument which was important to the outcome of the applicant’s case concerning the allocation of the
CASE OF LABAZNIKOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 7670/11
INTRODUCTION. The present case concerns the alleged arbitrariness of the applicant’s pre-trial detention, the alleged absence of a meaningful review of the lawfulness of his detention,
CASE OF TLASHADZE AND KAKASHVILI v. GEORGIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 41674/10
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns the alleged unfairness, within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, of the criminal proceedings conducted against the applicants on account of the manner in which the principal
CASE OF CAUCHI v. MALTA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 14013/19
The present application concerns compensation and redress for a breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in relation to the disproportionate amount of rent received by the applicant,
CASE OF MATALAS v. GREECE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 1864/18
INTRODUCTION. The application concerns the criminal conviction of the applicant, the managing director of a public limited liability company, for slanderous defamation of the former lawyer of the company.