INTRODUCTION. The case concerns proceedings brought against the applicants under the Proceeds of Crime Act, 1996 (“the Act”), the length of which, the applicants claim, did not comply with the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
CASE OF GRUBIC v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 33602/17
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns the applicant’s complaints, under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention, that in the criminal proceedings against him the submissions of the State Attorney’s Office were not communicated to the defence,
CASE OF LEWANDOWSKI v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 29848/17
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns the unreasonable length of the criminal proceedings against the applicant and lack of an effective remedy to complain thereof.
CASE OF SAPONJA AND KARAULA v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 72962/16 and28751/17
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns the applicants’ complaints, under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention, that in the criminal proceedings conducted against them they had not been given an opportunity to attend
CASE OF TORTLADZE v. GEORGIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 42371/08
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns, in particular, the search conducted in the course of a preliminary criminal investigation in the office of the Honorary Consular General of Côte d’Ivoire in Georgia,
CASE OF DABIC v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 49001/14
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns the extent of the State’s positive obligations under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in the situation where the State had sequestered the applicant’s house and had used it to provide accommodation
CASE OF YURIY CHUMAK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 23897/10
INTRODUCTION. The application, lodged under Article 10 of the Convention, concerns the failure of the domestic authorities, including the courts, to address the applicant’s information request.
Hussein and Others v. Belgium (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 249 March 2021 Hussein and Others v. Belgium – 45187/12 Judgment 16.3.2021 [Section III]
CASE OF MOROSANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 84271/17 and 4 others – see appended list
INTRODUCTION. The present cases concern the criminal investigations opened by the military prosecutor’s office into the events of the Romanian Revolution in December 1989,
CASE OF YANCHOVICHIN v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 78907/16
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns complaints that the applicant was subjected to ill‑treatment by a police officer while in custody and that the national authorities did not conduct