Communicated on 22 January 2021 Published on 8 February 2021 THIRD SECTION Applications nos. 55082/19 and 55095/19 GunnarLEPASAAR against Estonia and Aneli SMIGELSKITE against Estonia lodged on 17 October 2019 and 17 October 2019 respectively
GORBATKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights)
Communicated on 22 January 2021 Published on 8 February 2021 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 78382/12 Volodymyr Yakovych GORBATKO against Ukraine lodged on 4 December 2012 STATEMENT OF FACTS
MILAYEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights)
Communicated on 22 January 2021 Published on 8 February 2021 THIRD SECTION Application no. 41295/20 Fedor Maksimovich MILAYEV against Russia lodged on 18 September 2020 STATEMENT OF FACTS
MATMUSAYEV AND ABDURASULOVA v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights)
Communicated on 22 January 2021 Published on 8 February 2021 THIRD SECTION Application no. 15160/19 Bakhtiyer Urazkulovich MATMUSAYEV and Rakhatkhan Osmonzhanovna ABDURASULOVA against Russia lodged on 12 February 2019 STATEMENT OF FACTS
CASE OF ZLICIC v. SERBIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 73313/17 and 20143/19
. The applications concern allegations of the applicant’s ill-treatment by the police, the respondent State’s alleged failure to conduct a proper investigation into this incident or to provide the applicant
CASE OF SATANOVSKA AND RODGERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 12354/19
. The present case concerns allegations under Article 8 of the Convention that the Ukrainian authorities, in the absence of sufficient grounds, ordered the return of the second applicant to the United Kingdom
CASE OF KONOPLYOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 43374/14
. The case concerns the applicant’s complaint about his confinement in a metal cage during court hearings and the alleged unlawfulness of his detention pending trial, under Articles 3 and 5 of the Convention.
CASE OF KUSHNIR v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 8531/13
. The case concerns the first-instance court’s failure to notify the applicant of the judgment delivered in his case and, as a consequence, the applicant’s inability to lodge an appeal against that judgment.
CASE OF FEDOROVA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 43768/12
. The case concerns the excessive length of civil proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF VELICHKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 22273/12
. The case concerns the lack of medical treatment in detention and the lack of an effective remedy in that regard.