. The present case concerns dissolution of the applicant association by a decision of the administrative authorities on account of the fact that bankruptcy proceedings had been opened against it,
CASE OF YUKHYMOVYCH v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 11464/12
. The case concerns the death of the applicant’s son during an arrest attempt and the domestic authorities’ failure to conduct a prompt and effective investigation into the matter in breach of Article
Usmanov v. Russia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 246 December 2020 Usmanov v. Russia – 43936/18 Judgment 22.12.2020 [Section III]
Selahattin Demirtas v. Turkey (no. 2) [GC] (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 246 December 2020 Selahattin Demirtaş v. Turkey (no. 2) [GC] – 14305/17 Judgment 22.12.2020 [GC]
Gestur Jonsson and Ragnar Halldor Hall v. Iceland [GC] (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 246 December 2020 Gestur Jónsson and Ragnar Halldór Hall v. Iceland [GC] – 68271/14 and 68273/14 Judgment 22.12.2020 [GC]
CASE OF M.L. v. NORWAY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 64639/16
. The application concerns a decision to deprive the applicant of her parental responsibilities in respect of her daughter, who had been in foster care, and authorise the daughter’s adoption by her foster parents.
CASE OF J.A. v. SWITZERLAND (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 6325/15
. This application concerns an alleged violation of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention. The applicant, a 52-year-old Spanish national who was born in Switzerland and has spent his entire life in Switzerland,
CASE OF PLOKHOVY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 45024/07
. The case concerns the applicants’ son’s death from a disease during his compulsory military service and the lack of an effective investigation in that regard.
CASE OF USMANOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 43936/18
. The case concerns the alleged breach of Article 8 of the Convention on account of the annulment of the applicant’s Russian citizenship and the subsequent decision to remove him from Russian territory.
CASE OF SELAHATTIN DEMIRTAS v. TURKEY (No. 2) (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 14305/17
PROCEDURE. The applicant alleged, in particular, thathis pre-trial detention had breached Articles 5, 10 and 18 of the Convention and Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.