. The applicants, Jehovah’s Witnesses, were assaulted by an Orthodox Christian priest. They complained, relying on Articles 3, 9 and 14 of the Convention, that the domestic authorities’ investigation into the incident had been inadequate.
CASE OF MIGORYANU AND RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES OF THE CITY OF IZMAIL v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 36046/15
. The case concerns the allegation of the applicants, a community of Jehovah’s Witnesses and its elder, under Articles 3, 9 and 14 of the Convention, that a group of Orthodox Christian believers disrupted their meeting in a violent fashion
CASE OF PARFENTYEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 44376/09
. The applicant complained that the publication of a newspaper article disclosing his personal information, accompanied by a photograph of him, and the prosecutor’s statement in relation
Balaskas v. Greece (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 245 November 2020
Cwik v. Poland (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 245 November 2020
CASE OF JIDOVOIU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights)
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF JIDOVOIU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application nos. 40930/15 and 8 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 5 November 2020
CASE OF OMEROVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA (European Court of Human Rights)
SECOND SECTION CASE OF OMEROVIĆ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA (Application no. 72470/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 5 November 2020
CASE OF BAZ v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 40962/13
. The case concerns the applicant’s complaint that his detention in Ukraine in the context of the examination of the Turkish authorities’ request for his extradition had been in breach of Article 5 § 1 (f) of the Convention.
CASE OF HAZIYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights)
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF HAZIYEVAND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN (Applications nos. 3650/12 and 4 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 5 November 2011
CASE OF SHEVELI AND SHENGELAYA v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 42730/11
. Relying on Article 9 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention respectively, the applicants complained that the domestic authorities had unlawfully interfered with their right to freedom of religion