. Following the final hearing in the criminal case concerning the mass disorder at Bolotnaya Square, some public gatherings took place in Moscow and St Petersburg in support of the persons convicted in that criminal case.
CASE OF BOGNAR v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 75757/14
. Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (right to a fair trial) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property), the applicant complained about the authorities’ failure to give a decision on the expropriation of…
CASE OF NAGIBIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 9685/08 and 8 others – see appended list
. The case concerns restrictions imposed by the authorities on the location, time and manner of conduct of several public events. The applicants also complained about being unlawfully arrested and convicted of various administrative offences.
CASE OF NISTOR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 22039/03
. The case concerns the length of the civil proceedings initiated by the applicants in order to recover possession of a property which had been nationalised under the former communist regime and had been sold by the State to third…
CASE OF NASTA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 22023/03 and 11 others – see appended list
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns the inability of the applicants to recover possession of their properties which had been unlawfully nationalised under the former communist regime and had been sold by the State to third parties.
CASE OF SUUR v. ESTONIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 41736/18
. The case concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 8 of the Convention regarding the ending of joint custody over his son, the granting of full custody to the child’s mother and the limiting of his contact rights with the…
CASE OF NAPOTNIK v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 33139/13
. The application concerns the immediate termination of the applicant’s diplomatic posting in Ljubljana, Slovenia, allegedly because of her pregnancy.
CASE OF PASQUINI v. SAN MARINO (No. 2) (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 23349/17
THIRD SECTION CASE OF PASQUINI v. SAN MARINO (No. 2) (Application no. 23349/17) JUDGMENT
CASE OF PEROVY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 47429/09
. The applicants in the present case are a married couple and their son, a seven-year-old first-year pupil at the time of the relevant events.
Roth v. Germany (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 244 October 2020