The present case concerns the duration of the detention on remand of the first applicant, Mr I. Slavkov. It also concerns the freezing of the three applicants’ assets with a view to their prospective forfeiture as proceeds of crime. THIRD…
CASE OF LUCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA – 55351/17
The present case concerns the alleged failure of the Moldovan authorities to protect the applicant from domestic violence and to support her in maintaining contact with her children. In the Court’s opinion, the combination of the above factors clearly demonstrates…
CASE OF A.D. v. MALTA – 12427/22
The case concerns the holding of the applicant, a vulnerable individual due to his alleged minority and health situation, in different detention centres for different purposes over several months. The Court notes that it has found a violation of Article…
CASE OF HOVHANNISYAN AND KARAPETYAN v. ARMENIA – 67351/13
The case concerns the death of the applicants’ sons as a result of a tragic shooting in the military unit where they were undergoing compulsory military service. The Court reiterates that Article 13 has no independent existence; it merely complements…
CASE OF DIMAKSYAN v. ARMENIA – 29906/14
The case concerns the death of the applicant’s son during his compulsory military service, allegedly as a result of having been accidentally shot by a fellow serviceman. There has accordingly been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention on…
CASE OF BÎZDÎGA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA – 15646/18
The present case concerns alleged disproportionate limitation of the applicant’s visiting rights, established in a deficient procedure, as well as the limitation of the applicant’s right of access to a court in proceedings concerning custody rights. Having regard to the…
CASE OF MOLOKOV v. UKRAINE – 60865/16
The case concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment in detention and the alleged inadequacy of the domestic investigation. In the light of the foregoing, the Court concludes that there has been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention under its…
CASE OF PREVIDI v. ITALY – 18216/15
The case concerns the deprivation of the applicant’s land through the application by the domestic courts of the constructive-expropriation rule (accessione invertita or occupazione acquisitiva). The Court notes that the applicants were deprived of their property by means of indirect…
CASE OF GURBANOV AND MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN – 20605/13
The case concerns the applicants’ alleged ill-treatment by law‑enforcement officers, the lack of an effective investigation into those allegations and the lack of justification for the application of the preventive measure of pre-trial detention in respect of them. Having regard…
CASE OF KOPCHINSKIY v. UKRAINE – 65647/12
The case concerns the alleged failure of the domestic courts to examine the applicant’s claims on the merits (Article 6 § 1 of the Convention). In the Court’s view, that situation amounts to a denial of justice which impaired the…