Information Note on the Court’s case-law 244 October 2020
Jecker v. Switzerland (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 244 October 2020
CASE OF YELKHOROYEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 46935/18
. The case concerns the abduction and subsequent disappearance of the applicant’s daughter in North Ossetia-Alania in 2010 and the ineffectiveness of the ensuing investigation into the matter.
CASE OF BOU HASSOUN v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 59066/16
. The case concerns the applicant’s expulsion on alleged national-security grounds and the separation from his family. The applicant relied on Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention, as well as on Article 1 of Protocol No. 7.
CASE OF SPATARU v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 5843/16
. The applicants complained that the criminal investigation into the death of their son had lacked diligence and had been ineffective. They relied on Article 6 of the Convention.
CASE OF BORETS-PERVAK AND MALDON v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 42276/15 and 54278/15
. On 26 January 2015 the applicants participated in a spontaneous gathering on Lubyanskiy Proyezd in Moscow to demand the release of captured Ukrainian pilot Nadezhda Savchenko.
CASE OF KARELSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 66856/14 and 33606/15
. On 21 February 2014 the applicants participated in a spontaneous gathering in front of the Zamoskvoretskiy District Court of Moscow where they came to attend a public hearing involving activists who were
CASE OF SVAROVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 47800/14 and 2 others – see appended list
. On 24 February 2014 the applicants participated in a spontaneous gathering in front of the Zamoskvoretskiy District Court of Moscow where they came to attend a public hearing involving activists who were
CASE OF POKA v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 31573/14
. The applicant complained under Article 11 of the Convention that his right to freedom of assembly had been unjustifiably restricted.
CASE OF DANILINY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 32400/12
. The present case concerns the alleged abduction and subsequent disappearance of the applicants’ relative in Dagestan in 2012, and the ineffectiveness of the ensuing investigation into the matter.