FIFTH SECTION CASE OF M.A. AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (Application no. 58680/18) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 5 October 2023 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF P.S. AND A.M. v. HUNGARY – 53272/17
The applicants are a mother (the first applicant) and her minor child (the second applicant), both Iraqi nationals. They complain about their four‑months confinement in a Hungarian transit zone and the degrading and inhuman conditions therein.
CASE OF EASTERN UKRAINIAN CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INITIATIVES v. UKRAINE
The applications concern refusals to allow the applicant NGO to access the master plans of various urban settlements, allegedly in violation of Article 10 of the Convention.
CASE OF VARZHABETYAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 60851/12 and 15 others
The applicants complained of the torture or inhuman or degrading treatment.
CASE OF MOYSEYETS AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE – 49701/12 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention.
CASE OF SHAHZAD v. HUNGARY (No. 2) – 37967/18
The case concerns the alleged ill-treatment of the applicant by Hungarian law‑enforcement officers. The alleged incident took place in August 2016 while he was being escorted back to the external side of the Hungarian border fence with Serbia, following his…
CASE OF GHAZARYAN AND BAYRAMYAN v. AZERBAIJAN – 33050/18
The application contains complaints under Articles 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 13, 14 and 34 of the Convention relating to the detention and trial of the applicant’s son.
CASE OF IKOTITY AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY – 50012/17
The case concerns the refusal to grant permission to the applicants – opposition members of parliament – to use posters during an interpellation speech by one of their colleagues, and ensuing sanctions relating to the use of such posters without…
CASE OF GURBANOV v. ARMENIA – 7432/17
The application concerns the applicant’s complaints relating to the delayed return by the Armenian authorities of his son’s body. It was alleged that this amounted to inhuman treatment under Article 3 of the Convention in relation to the applicant and…
CASE OF ANDRZEJ RUCIŃSKI v. POLAND – 22716/12
The case concerns a lack of compensation for disproportionate interference by the tax authorities with the applicant’s business. In the light of the above considerations, the Court finds that the restrictions imposed on the applicant’s personal and business property for…