The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF KURMAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 41670/18 and 38 others – see appended list) JUDGMEN STRASBOURG 14 September 2023 This judgment is final but it…
CASE OF RUBANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 38099/18 and 39 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF RUBANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 38099/18 and 39 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 14 September 2023 This judgment is final but it…
CASE OF DIAKITÈ v. ITALY – 44646/17
The case concerns the material conditions of stay of the applicant, a minor migrant, in the Red Cross adults’ reception centre in Rome, Via Ramazzini, as well as the lack of application in his case of the procedural guarantees set…
CASE OF KOZAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 27284/17 and 10 others
The applicants complained of the torture or inhuman or degrading treatment. THIRD SECTION CASE OF KOZAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 27284/17 and 10 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 14 September 2023 This judgment is final but…
CASE OF M.N. v. HUNGARY – 48139/16
The case concerns the applicant’s asylum detention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF M.N. v. HUNGARY (Application no. 48139/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 14 September 2023 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of M.N. v.…
CASE OF A.A. v. HUNGARY – 7077/15
The case concerns the applicant’s asylum detention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A.A. v. HUNGARY (Application no. 7077/15) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 14 September 2023 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of A.A. v.…
CASE OF VALIULLINA AND OTHERS v. LATVIA – 56928/19, 7306/20 and 11937/20
The case concerns legislative amendments of 2018 (“the 2018 amendments” or “the 2018 reform”) whereby the proportion of subjects to be taught in the State language, that is, Latvian, was increased in public schools, and the use of Russian as…
CASE OF ZAMMIT AND BUSUTTIL v. MALTA – 55102/20
The applicants complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention alone and in conjunction with Article 13 of the Convention that they remained victims of the violation upheld by the domestic court due to the low amount…
CASE OF VASSALLO v. MALTA – 52795/20
The applicants complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention alone and in conjunction with Article 13 that they were still victims of the violation upheld by the domestic court as a result of the low amount of…
CASE OF S.S. AND J.H. v. NORWAY – 15784/19
SECOND SECTION CASE OF S.S. AND J.H. v. NORWAY (Application no. 15784/19) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 12 September 2023 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of S.S. and J.H. v. Norway, The European…