FIRST SECTION CASE OF ASKEROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 1712/20 and 20 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 23 March 2023
CASE OF HAKOBYAN v. GEORGIA – 64300/16
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF HAKOBYAN v. GEORGIA (Application no. 64300/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 23 March 2023
CASE OF BAGAUTDINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 48041/16 and 17 others
FIRST SECTION CASE OF BAGAUTDINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 48041/16 and 17 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 23 March 2023
CASE OF ABISHOV v. AZERBAIJAN – 46419/16
The case concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment by law‑enforcement officers during his arrest and later while in police custody.
CASE OF ROGACHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 64754/14 and 19 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as participants of public assemblies.
CASE OF GUKOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 39118/12 and 19 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as participants and organisers of public assemblies.
CASE OF GAYIBOVA v. AZERBAIJAN – 33085/12
The application concerns the search of the applicant’s flat and the seizure of a sum of money in the course of a criminal investigation in respect of her son-in-law, O.K.
CASE OF KUDRYASHOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 2606/12 and 29 others
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers and participants of public assemblies.
CASE OF PIRTSKHALAVA AND TSAADZE v. GEORGIA – The present case concerns the applicants’ complaint that they were not given a fair trial, because of the domestic courts’ reliance on what the applicants considered to be unreliable witness evidence.
The present case concerns the applicants’ complaint that they were not given a fair trial, as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, because of the domestic courts’ reliance on what
CASE OF UDOVYCHENKO v. UKRAINE – 46396/14. The case concerns the applicant’s civil liability, for a factual statement which she had been unable to prove.
The case concerns the applicant’s civil liability, allegedly in breach of Article 10 of the Convention, for a factual statement which she had been unable to prove.