FIFTH SECTION CASE OF SANCHYSHYN v. UKRAINE (Application no. 81639/17) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 7 March 2019 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Sanchyshyn v. Ukraine, The European Court of Human Rights…
CASE OF GRIGORYEV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights)
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF GRIGORYEV v. UKRAINE (Application no. 32569/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 7 March 2019 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Grigoryev v. Ukraine, The European Court of Human Rights…
CASE OF KOROL AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights)
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KOROL AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 54503/08 and 7 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 7 March 2019 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of…
Striking out (Article 37) / Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR 2016
Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR 2016 Striking out (Article 37)[302] The issue before the Grand Chamber in Khan v. Germany[303] was whether an application should be struck out since the applicant faced no risk of expulsion in the…
Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18) / Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR 2016
Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR 2016 Other Convention provisions Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18) The Navalnyy and Ofitserov v. Russia[290] judgment concerned the applicability of Article 18 of the Convention when relied on in…
Protection of property (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1) / Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR 2016
Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR 2016 Protection of property (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1) Applicability In its judgment in Béláné Nagy v. Hungary[276] the Grand Chamber examined how the notion of “legitimate expectation” had evolved since its…
Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14) / Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR 2016
Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR 2016 Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14) [253] Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 8 The judgment in Biao v. Denmark[254] related to a restriction on family reunification, which indirectly discriminated against persons such as…
Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11) / Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR 2016
Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR 2016 Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11) Freedom of peaceful assembly [246] The Frumkin v. Russia[247] judgment related to the State authorities’ positive obligation to communicate with the leaders of a protest…
Freedom of expression (Article 10) / Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR 2016
Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR 2016 Freedom of expression (Article 10) Applicability In its judgment in Semir Güzel v. Turkey[209] the Court examined the question of conduct as a form of expression protected by Article 10. The applicant was…
Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9) / Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR 2016
Overview of the Case-law of the ECHR 2016 Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9) Freedom of religion[195] İzzettin Doğan and Others v. Turkey[196] concerned the State’s obligation of impartiality and neutrality as regards religious beliefs. The applicants are…