The case concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that equipment belonging to her and situated on municipal land had been unlawfully dismantled, for which she had been unable to obtain compensation.
CASE OF LAPSA v. LATVIA (European Court of Human Rights) 57444/19
The case concerns the effectiveness of domestic proceedings concerning the applicant’s allegations under Article 2 of the Convention that her child had died as a result of medical negligence.
CASE OF KORNICKA-ZIOBRO v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 23037/16
The case concerns allegations of a breach of procedural obligations under Article 2 of the Convention, in that the investigation into the death in hospital of Mr J.Z. was not effective, thorough and prompt.
CASE OF M.T. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN (European Court of Human Rights) 22105/18
The application concerns the Swedish authorities’ refusal to grant residence permits to a mother and her son, who were in Syria, on the basis of their family ties with another son/brother who had been
CASE OF BIERSKI v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 46342/19
The present application concerns complaints of violations of the applicant’s right of access to a court and right to respect for his family life on account of the courts’ refusal to regulate his contact with his incapacitated adult son.
CASE OF DOLENC v. SLOVENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 20256/20
The case concerns recognition by the Slovenian courts of judgments issued by an Israeli district court in civil proceedings against the applicant. In May 1992 the applicant, an internationally renowned neurosurgeon,
Muhammad v. Spain (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 267 October 2022 Muhammad v. Spain – 34085/17 Judgment 18.10.2022 [Section III] Article 14 Discrimination
Mørck Jensen v. Denmark (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law October 2022 Mørck Jensen v. Denmark – 60785/19 Judgment 18.10.2022 [Section II] Article 7 Article 7-1 Nullum crimen sine lege
Basu v. Germany (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 267 October 2022 Basu v. Germany – 215/19 Judgment 18.10.2022 [Section III] Article 14 Discrimination
CASE OF BAOTIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (European Court of Human Rights) 49560/20
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the fairness of Constitutional Court proceedings, because the Constitutional Court had not allowed him an opportunity to comment on