The application concerns the delayed provision of compensation to the applicant for her property which was expropriated for urban development in 1984 by the municipal authorities of Dobrich.
CASE OF MORAL AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE (European Court of Human Rights) 49867/17 and 31 others
The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described
CASE OF SEVINÇ AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE (European Court of Human Rights) 63634/16 and 134 others
The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described
CASE OF MOAMER v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) 40124/19
The application concerns the delayed provision of compensation to the applicants for their mother’s property, expropriated in 1991 for urban development by the municipal authorities of Dobrich.
CASE OF LOUCAIDES v. CYPRUS (European Court of Human Rights) 60277/19
The case concerns the fairness of criminal proceedings brought against the applicant for interfering with judicial proceedings and the allegedly arbitrary findings of the domestic courts in that regard.
CASE OF MUHAMMAD v. SPAIN (European Court of Human Rights) 34085/17
This case concerns a check of the applicant’s identity by the police on the street. The applicant claimed that the identity check had been carried out because of his dark skin colour,
CASE OF FABBRI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINO (European Court of Human Rights) 6319/21 and 3 Others
The applications concern the discontinuation of criminal proceedings against third parties because the investigations became time-barred as a result of the authorities’ inaction.
CASE OF MØRCK JENSEN v. DENMARK (European Court of Human Rights) 60785/19
The application concerned the applicant’s conviction under section 114j of the Penal Code, read with Executive Order no. 1200 of 28 September 2016 Prohibiting the Entry into or Stay in Certain Conflict Zones
CASE OF BASU v. GERMANY (European Court of Human Rights) 215/19
The application concerns a check of the applicant’s identity by the police on a train. The applicant claimed that the identity check had been carried out because of his dark skin colour,
CASE OF STANCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 22953/16
The applicants complained that the sentence imposed on them for a press article published in a publication they were editing breached their right to freedom of expression.