The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention.He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF PONKRATENKO v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 27314/20
The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention and that there was no effective remedy in that regard.
CASE OF KULAKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26200/20 and 8 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF PIMENOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 24963/20 and 21 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty). They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF ULANIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2376/20 and 4 others
The applicants complained of the length of their pre-trial detention and about the domestic courts’ failure to explain the reasons for inapplicability of Article 108 § 1.1
CASE OF BRITVIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2113/20 and 10 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention.Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF KUIMOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 1796/20
The applicant complained about his confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against him.
CASE OF POPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 56676/19 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention.Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF CZESZEL v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 47731/19
The present case concerns the allegedly excessive length of the applicant’s detention on remand.
CASE OF MIKHALEV AND SAVINOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 45095/19 and 28947/20
The applicants alleged that they did not receive adequate medical care in detention and that there was no effective remedy in that regard.In application no. 45095/19,