European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 10393/22) The application concerns the non-enforcement of a decision awarding compensation for the excessive length of judicial proceedings under Law no. 89 of 24 March 2001, known as the “Pinto Act” (“Pinto” decision)…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF UTZERI v. ITALY – 10393/22
The application concerns the non-enforcement of a decision awarding compensation for the excessive length of judicial proceedings. European Court of Human Rights FIRST SECTION CASE OF UTZERI v. ITALY (Application no. 10393/22) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 11 January 2024
CASE OF MALIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention
European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF MALIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 57814/18 and 35 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 11 January 2024
CASE OF KAYUMOVY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 56727/18 and 8 others
The applicants complained of the restrictions on family visits in pre‑trial detention facilities.
CASE OF SAMARUKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 54274/18 and 31 others
European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF SAMARUKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 54274/18 and 31 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 11 January 2024
CASE OF GALEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 41539/18 and 50 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.
CASE OF KARGASHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 4815/18 and 21 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty).
CASE OF TSYOGE FON MANTEYFEL v. UKRAINE – The application concerns the compulsory psychiatric treatment of the applicant, who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia
European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 29804/16) The application, lodged under Articles 5, 34 and 38 of the Convention, concerns the compulsory psychiatric treatment of the applicant, who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia, following a court order in criminal proceedings…
CASE OF TSYOGE FON MANTEYFEL v. UKRAINE – 29804/16
The application, lodged under Articles 5, 34 and 38 of the Convention, concerns the compulsory psychiatric treatment of the applicant, who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia, following a court order in criminal proceedings against her on a charge of murder.
CASE OF SHMAKOVA v. UKRAINE – The case concerns the deprivation of the applicant’s title to a plot of land following the proceedings brought by a prosecutor to have that land returned to a State-owned plant
European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 70445/13) The applicant complained that she had been unlawfully deprived of her property, in that after its reorganisation the plant could not have retained its title to the permanent use of the land…