CASE OF GALEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 41539/18 and 50 others

Last Updated on January 11, 2024 by LawEuro

The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.


European Court of Human Rights
FIFTH SECTION
CASE OF GALEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 41539/18 and 50 others – see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
11 January 2024

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Galeyev and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
María Elósegui, President,
Mattias Guyomar,
Kateřina Šimáčková, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 7 December 2023,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.

2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS

3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.

4. The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

II. Jurisdiction

6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).

III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION

7. The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

“No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

8. The Court notes that the applicants were detained in poor conditions during transport. The details of the applicants’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding cramped and defective conditions during the transit of prisoners (see Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 124-27, 9 April 2019). It reiterates in particular that a strong presumption of a violation arises when detainees are transported in conveyances offering less than 0.5 square metres of space per person, regardless of whether such cramped conditions result from an excessive number of detainees being transported together or from the restrictive design of compartments (ibid., § 125). As regards longer journeys, factors such as a failure to arrange an individual sleeping place for each detainee or to secure an adequate supply of drinking water and food or access to the toilet seriously aggravate the situation of prisoners during transfers and are indicative of a violation of Article 3 (ibid., § 127).

9. In the leading case of Tomov and Others (cited above), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ conditions of detention during their transport were inadequate.

11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.

IV. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW

12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill‑founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), as regards placement in a metal cage during court hearings, Tomov and Others, cited above, §§ 92‑156, concerning the lack of an effective remedy to complain about poor conditions of detention during transport; Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019, concerning permanent video surveillance of detainees and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect; Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 101-11, 27 November 2012, concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention; Andrey Smirnov v. Russia, no. 43149/10, 13 February 2018, Resin v. Russia, no. 9348/14, 18 December 2018, Chaldayev v. Russia, no. 33172/16, 28 May 2019, Pshibiyev and Berov v. Russia, no. 63748/13, 9 June 2020, and Mukhametov and Others v. Russia, nos. 53404/18 and 3 others, 14 December 2021, related to various restrictions on family visits in pre-trial detention facilities; and Yevdokimov and Others v. Russia, nos. 27236/05 and 10 others, §§ 17-53, 16 February 2016, concerning domestic courts’ refusal to bring detainees to hearings in civil cases).

13. In view of the above findings, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the complaints lodged by some applicants under Article 13 of the Convention about the lack of effective domestic remedies to complain about their placement in a metal cage in courtrooms (compare Valyuzhenich v. Russia, no. 10597/13, § 27, 26 March 2019).

V. remaining complaints

14. Mr Tikhomirov (application no. 5682/20) complained under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention about conditions of his post-conviction detention from 19 July 2017 to 3 September 2019 and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect. He alleged, inter alia, that the personal space allocated to him had been approximately 1.36 square metres, which was below the national standard of 2 square metres.

15. As to the complaint under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court notes that, as matters stand, the material facts complained of by the applicant have ceased to exist. He is no longer detained in the conditions complained of. It also notes that it was open to the applicant to make resort to a new compensatory remedy, introduced by the Russian Federation on 27 January 2020, in respect of his complaints concerning the conditions of detention in breach of the national legislation (see Shmelev and Others v. Russia (dec.), nos. 41743/17 and 16 others, 17 March 2020).

16. Regard being had to its findings in Shmelev and Others (cited above) that the said remedy presents, in principle, an adequate and effective avenue for redress and offers reasonable prospects of success (ibid., § 54), the Court considers it is no longer justified to continue the examination of this part of the application (Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention) and that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the complaint under Article 37 § 1 in fine. Accordingly, this part of the application should be struck out of the list.

17. As regards the complaint under Article 13 of the Convention, the Court has examined it and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, this complaint does not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention. It follows that this part of the application must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

VI. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

18. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Pukhachev and Zaretskiy v. Russia, nos. 17494/16 and 29203/16, 16 November 2017), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

1. Decides to join the applications;

2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;

3. Declares the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport and the other complaints under the well‑established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible; decides to strike the part of application no. 5682/20 out of its list of cases as regards the complaints about poor conditions of post‑conviction detention and declares the remainder of that application inadmissible;

4. Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport;

5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table);

6. Holds that it is not necessary to examine separately the complaints raised under Article 13 of the Convention in respect of lack of domestic remedies to complain about the placement in a metal cage in the courtrooms;

7. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 11 January 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Viktoriya Maradudina               María Elósegui
Acting Deputy Registrar              President

_________

APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention
(inadequate conditions of detention during transport)

No. Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

 

Representative’s name and location Means of transport

Start and end date

Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Other complaints under well‑established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant/household

(in euros)[i]

1. 41539/18

17/08/2018

Roman Uralovich GALEYEV

1984

 

 

train

21/12/2017 to

03/12/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

train

15/12/2020 to

17/12/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.3-0.6 m²

 

 

several occasions of transport during the indicated period by train in similar conditions: no or restricted access to toilet, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, 12 inmates were placed in a train compartment during the trip, the trip each time lasted from 17 to 24 hours

 

overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, the trip lasted

40 hours, no or restricted access to toilet

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
2. 41927/18

22/08/2018

Vladimir Nikolayevich TRUNILIN

1960

 

 

van, transit cell, train

19/07/2018 to

20/07/2018

 

train, van

09/11/2018 to

27/12/2018

 

 

train, transit cell, van

09/10/2019 to

10/10/2019

 

 

 

 

train, van

17/11/2019 to

17/11/2019

 

 

 

train, van

17/12/2020 to

18/12/2020

 

 

 

train, van

29/01/2021 to

30/01/2021

0.3 m²

 

 

passive smoking, overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient electric light

 

 

insufficient number of sleeping places, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet

 

 

lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of fresh air, overcrowding, lack of or insufficient electric light, no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet

 

lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to running water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet, overcrowding

 

overcrowding, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet

 

insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
3. 42048/18

11/01/2019

Vadim Nikolayevich VEDENEYEV

1964

 

 

train, transit cell, van

28/06/2018 to

25/07/2018

insufficient number of sleeping places, transport in cells not adapted to requirements of disabled inmates, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, passive smoking, impediments to continuous night sleep, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet, overcrowding 1,000
4. 42446/18

26/08/2018

Yelizaveta Sergeyevna SIMONOVA

1997

Ivan Severovich Sidorov

Moscow

van, transit cell

11/04/2018

30/05/2019

0.3-0.5 m² Numerous occasions of transport within the indicated period between the detention facility and the courthouse; overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
5. 42832/18

21/08/2018

Roman Yuryevich SVERCHKOV

1982

 

 

train, van

03/07/2018 to

07/08/2018

0.3 m²

 

 

insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, no or restricted access to toilet, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to potable water Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
6. 42843/18

18/08/2018

Aleksey Petrovich MARTYNOV

1982

 

 

train

25/06/2018 to

31/07/2018

0.2 m²

 

 

lack of fresh air, lack of ventilation, passive smoking, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, insufficient number of sleeping places 1,000
7. 42934/18

23/08/2018

Bobomurod Ruzi ugli SUYUNOV

1993

Aleksey Gennadyevich Kudryavtsev

Kolpino

train

25/04/2018 to

25/05/2018

overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of ventilation, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient electric light 1,000
8. 43137/18

17/08/2018

Konstantin Vladimirovich PLAMADYALA

1981

 

 

train, transit cell, van

03/07/2018 to

04/07/2018

0.3 m²

 

 

lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, insufficient number of sleeping places

 

 

 

1,000
9. 43158/18

16/08/2018

Ilya Nikolayevich KLYUYEV

1987

 

 

train

03/02/2016 to

27/07/2018

0.3 m²

 

 

transport on 103 occasions, lack of or insufficient electric light, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack or insufficient quantity of food, passive smoking, no or restricted access to toilet Art. 3 – use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms – in the Inta Town Court, 03/09/2018-25/01/2019 8,500
10. 43170/18

27/08/2018

Vitaliy Valeryevich SAFRONOV

1978

 

 

train, van

11/07/2018 to

12/07/2018

 

 

train, van

31/07/2018 to

31/07/2018

 

van, train

09/02/2019 to

19/02/2019

 

train, van

13/07/2019 to

14/07/2019

 

 

van

26/07/2019 to

26/07/2019

0.3 m²

 

 

 

 

0.3 m²

 

 

 

0.34 m²

 

 

 

< 1 m²

 

 

 

 

< 1 m²

 

inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient electric light

 

 

see above

 

 

 

lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, insufficient number of sleeping places

 

 

no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air

 

lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to toilet

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
11. 44539/18

07/09/2018

Pavel Sergeyevich CHERKASOV

1984

 

 

transit cell, train

11/03/2018 to

26/04/2018

0.8 m²

 

 

bunk beds, passive smoking, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of fresh air

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;

 

Art. 3 – use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms – hearings in a civil case on 30/09/2020, 15/10/2020 in the Ivdel Town Court of the Sverdlovsk Region and on 26/04/2021, 13/05/2021 in the Chernovskiy District Court of Chita through a video link from IK-6 Khabarovsk Region being confined in a metal cage;

 

Art. 6 (1) – absence of detainees from civil proceedings – the applicant was not present at the court hearings of his case concerning allegedly unlawful handcuffing; his appeals to ensure his presence at the hearings were dismissed with reference to the applicant’s status as a detainee

9,000
12. 44565/18

30/08/2018

Rafik Arturovich PETROSYAN

1986

 

 

transit cell, train, van

05/06/2018 to

13/07/2018

0.4 m²

 

 

passive smoking, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places 1,000
13. 44617/18

31/08/2018

Aleksandr Nikolayevich STULOV

1995

 

 

van

26/09/2014 to

10/05/2018

0.3-0.5 m²

 

 

overcrowding, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, lack or insufficient quantity of food 1,000
14. 45200/18

22/08/2018

Aleksandr Vladimirovich POVARKOV

1991

 

 

van

01/12/2017 to

27/04/2018

0.3 m²

 

 

inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, passive smoking 1,000
15. 45827/18

28/08/2018

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich KOZLOV

1968

 

 

train, van

29/06/2018 to

29/06/2018

0.3 m²

 

 

overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or insufficient electric light, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to toilet Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
16. 46288/18

12/09/2018

Stepan Igorevich NIKONOV

1993

 

 

transport by train and detention in transit facilities

17/07/2018 to

30/07/2018

insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
17. 46556/18

12/09/2018

Vadim Rishatovich DILABIROV

1984

 

 

van, numerous occasions of transport

19/07/2017 to

01/06/2018

0.25 m²

 

 

overcrowding, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, lack of safety equipment inside the vans, passive smoking, no or restricted access to toilet Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
18. 46596/18

23/09/2018

Dmitriy Aleksandrovich YALOVIK

1969

Olga Viktorovna Golub

Suzemka

van, in “metal glass”,

transit cell

18/06/2018 to

18/06/2018

0.3 m²

 

 

lack or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to potable water, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light 1,000
19. 47490/18

25/09/2018

Ilyas Misir ogly NAGIYEV

1984

 

 

train, (two trips)

03/08/2018 to

19/08/2018

overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of fresh air Art. 8 (1) – permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities – video surveillance of the applicant in IK-25, Komi Republic, since 12/2018 and on-going as of 16/09/2022. It includes, in particular: detention in different cells with video surveillance; opposite-sex operators; video surveillance in shower rooms; video surveillance during medical examinations;

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities

1,000
20. 47560/18

23/01/2019

Mikhail Sergeyevich VIKULOV

1988

 

 

train

24/04/2018 to

19/08/2018

overcrowding, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
21. 47565/18

20/08/2018

Emil Elchin ogly GUSEYNOV

1989

 

 

train

15/08/2018 to

28/08/2018

 

 

 

 

van

05/12/2018 to

19/12/2018

 

van

08/04/2019 to

24/04/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.35 m²

 

 

 

0.35 m²

 

 

inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding, passive smoking

 

overcrowding, lack of fresh air

 

 

 

overcrowding, lack of safety equipment, lack of fresh air

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
22. 47947/18

11/09/2018

Aleksandr Fedorovich BURIK

1976

 

 

train, van

26/05/2018 to

27/05/2018

 

train, van

11/09/2018 to

12/09/2018

0.4 m²

 

 

overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet, passive smoking, lack of or insufficient electric light

 

insufficient number of sleeping places, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding

1,000
23. 48634/18

04/10/2018

Household:

Artur Raulevich SALIMOV

1986

Suleyman Arturovich SALIMOV

2012

Ismail Arturovich SALIMOV

2014

Alsu Danilovna AGALYAMOVA

1989

Gulnara Naisovna SALIMOVA

1966

 

 

Transport of the first applicant:

van, numerous occasions of transport between the detention facility and to take part in investigative actions or to the courthouse

30/05/2017 to

30/07/2018

0.3 m²

 

 

overcrowding, lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, lack of safety equipment, lack of or insufficient electric light

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of refusals of family visits in pre-trial detention and in respect of the inadequate conditions of detention during transport (for the first applicant);

 

Art. 8 (1) – restrictions on family visits in pre-trial facilities – all applicants complain about the refusals of long-term family visits in SIZO-3, Sterlitamak, where the first applicant was detained between 04/02/2015 and 22/10/2020

5,000
24. 49012/18

05/10/2018

Said Dzhandarovich DZHANALIYEV

1983

 

 

van

24/04/2018 to

24/04/2018

 

 

0.26 m²

 

 

lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, poor quality of food

 

1,000
25. 49439/18

21/10/2018

Mubariz Orudzh Ogly MAMEDOV

1972

 

 

van, numerous occasions of transport between the detention facility and the courthouse

15/04/2015 to

04/09/2018

0.2 m²

 

overcrowding, lack of fresh air 1,000
26. 49523/18

28/09/2018

Renat Bisenbayevich SAKAUOV

1985

 

 

train, van

27/08/2018 to

17/09/2018

 

transit cell

25/03/2019 to

10/04/2019

 

 

 

 

0.4-2.1 m²

 

 

detention in transit facilities; overcrowding; restricted access to toilet; passive smoking; lack of a sleeping place

 

lack of ventilation, mouldy or dirty cell, inadequate temperature, passive smoking, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient natural light, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of fresh air, overcrowding, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
27. 49597/18

01/10/2018

Andrey Aleksandrovich SMIRNOV

1984

 

 

train, van

04/12/2017 to

25/04/2018

overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, passive smoking, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, frequent strip-searches, lack or insufficient quantity of food Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
28. 49699/18

09/10/2018

Ramil Salikhovich ADILOV

1983

 

 

train

26/03/2019 to

27/03/2019

overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of fresh air

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
29. 49714/18

01/10/2018

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich YEGOROV

1991

 

 

train, van

25/06/2018 to

27/06/2018

 

 

 

 

 

train, van

27/07/2018 to

29/07/2018

 

 

 

 

 

train, van

09/11/2019 to

11/11/2019

0.2 m²

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2 m²

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2 m²

 

 

overcrowding, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to running water, lack of privacy for toilet, poor quality of food

 

overcrowding, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, insufficient number of sleeping places, no or restricted access to running water, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet, poor quality of food

 

lack of fresh air, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or insufficient electric light, overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, poor quality of potable water

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;

 

Art. 8 (1) – permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities – in IK-31 Komi Republic since 11/09/2020, pending as of 16/09/2022, video surveillance by opposite-sex operators

1,000
30. 49940/18

01/10/2018

Valeriy Valeryevich AKIMOV

1987

 

 

train, transit cell

02/05/2018 to

02/06/2018

0.5 m²

 

 

no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or insufficient electric light, insufficient number of sleeping places, poor quality of food, passive smoking, overcrowding, lack of fresh air

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;

 

Art. 8 (1) – permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities – permanent video surveillance in IK-6 Krasnoyarsk Region where he was detained between 02/05 and 10/05/2018, and between 26/05 and 01/06/2018 (video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room, opposite-sex operators);

 

Art. 3 – use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms – in the Sverdlovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk on 09/07/2021

8,500
31. 50043/18

09/10/2018

Aleksandr Albertovich SELEZNEV

1958

 

 

train, van

05/06/2018 to

05/06/2018

 

 

 

train, van

07/06/2019 to

08/06/2019

overcrowding, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen

 

lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, passive smoking, insufficient number of sleeping places

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
32. 50552/18

15/10/2018

Irek Ilfirovich NASIROV

1985

 

 

van, transport of the applicant on numerous occasions between the detention facility and the courthouse or to investigators

19/04/2018 to

24/08/2018

0.2 m²

 

 

overcrowding, passive smoking, lack of or insufficient electric light, no belts or handles, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to potable water, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to toilet

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate condition during transport and refusal of family visits during detention;

 

Art. 3 – use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms – placement in a cage in the court hearings before the Privolzhskiy Circuit Military Court, and the Military Court of the Samara Garrison, trial judgment of 13/03/2019;

 

Art. 8 (1) – lack of practical opportunities for or restriction on prison visits – impossibility to see and have physical contact with the applicant’s wife and relatives

9,750
33. 50942/18

17/10/2018

Tarlan Firudinovich EYLER

1969

 

 

transit cell, van, transport on numerous occasions to the courthouse from the detention facility in the period

15/12/2017 to

25/06/2018

lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, lack of security measures

 

Art. 3 – use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms – from 15/12/2017 to 25/06/2018 in the Smolninskiy District Court of St Petersburg. 8,500
34. 51296/18

21/09/2018

Nikolay Nikolayevich YEPANOV

1984

 

 

van, train

09/04/2018 to

11/04/2018

 

van, train

23/08/2018 to

25/08/2018

0.67 m²

 

 

 

0.5 m²

 

 

overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet

 

lack of fresh air, overcrowding, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to toilet

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
35. 51558/18

16/01/2019

Anatoliy Vladimirovich BOBKIN

1981

 

 

van, train

03/09/2018 to

04/09/2018

 

 

 

 

 

van, train

01/10/2018 to

01/10/2018

0.3-0.5 m²

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.4-0.5 m²

 

 

overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of privacy for toilet

 

overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
36. 51667/18

24/10/2018

Household:

Khalil Fanaviyevich MUSTAFIN

1984

Gulyusa Mauziyevna MUSTAFINA

1950

Fanavi Fatkhebrarovich MUSTAFIN

1948

Sumayya Khalilovna MUSTAFINA

2015

 

 

 

Transport of the first applicant by van, numerous occasions of transport

30/05/2017 to

30/07/2018

lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, passive smoking, no or restricted access to toilet

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport in respect of the first applicant;

 

Art. 8 (1) – restrictions on family visits in pre-trial facilities – the applicants are the detainee and his family members – mother, father, child. Relevant period – from 20/02/2015 to 21/09/2020 (the date of transfer to the correctional facility); they complain that they had been denied family visits while the first applicant was in pre-trial detention during the above indicated period. On 20/02/2015 the first applicant was placed in pre-trial detention. On 30/07/2018 the Privolzhskiy District Military Court convicted him, upheld on appeal – 21/09/2020, by the Supreme Court.

5,000
37. 52172/18

05/11/2018

Irek Rishatovich TAGIROV

1989

 

 

van, transit cell, numerous occasions of transport between the detention facility and the courthouse

31/05/2017 to

30/07/2018

0.1-1 m²

 

 

lack of fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to toilet Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
38. 52378/18

23/10/2018

Radmir Yusifovich MAKSUTOV

1984

 

 

van, transit cell, (133 trips), between the detention facility and the courthouse

31/05/2017 to

30/07/2018

lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, passive smoking

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
39. 52685/18

23/10/2018

Bobur Urinboy ugli KHUDAYBERGANOV

1995

 

 

train

03/08/2018 to

12/09/2018

overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet

 

1,000
40. 52926/18

23/10/2018

Rustem Ravilevich GALLYAMOV

1981

 

 

transit cell, van

30/05/2017 to

30/07/2018

 

train, van

29/10/2020 to

21/11/2020

0.3 m²

 

 

 

0,3 m²

 

 

overcrowding, lack of fresh air

 

 

 

insufficient number of sleeping places, passive smoking, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to warm water, lack or insufficient quantity of food

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
41. 53190/18

01/11/2018

Ilya Sergeyevich SIDORUK

1983

Inna Viktorovna Koltman

Moscow

transport on numerous occasions from the detention facilities to take part in investigative actions or to court hearings

31/05/2015 to

29/05/2018

up to 14 hours per day in the van; lack of fresh air; restricted access to toilet; insufficient quantity of food; inadequate temperature

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
42. 53248/18

01/11/2018

Radik Nailevich KHAMIDULLIN

1985

 

 

van

12/10/2013 to

24/08/2018

0.25 m²

 

 

lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding, numerous occasions of transport, between the detention facilities; or to take part in court hearings Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
43. 53331/18

29/10/2018

Aleksandr Vladimirovich MOKHNATKIN

1975

 

 

train, van

09/06/2018 to

10/06/2018

 

train, van

17/11/2018 to

17/11/2018

0.3 m²

 

 

lack of or insufficient electric light, insufficient number of sleeping places, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding

 

see above

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
44. 53723/18

05/03/2019

Ruslan Lenurovich NIKITENKO

1997

 

 

van, numerous occasions of transport between the detention facilities and the courthouse

09/11/2017 to

16/11/2018

overcrowding, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet

 

1,000
45. 53942/18

05/07/2019

Aleksandr Sergeyevich ANISHCHENKO

1987

 

 

train

20/02/2019 to

21/02/2019

lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, poor quality of potable water, poor quality of food, insufficient number of sleeping places Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
46. 53971/18

11/12/2018

Rizvan Abdurashidovich SHAKHMARDANOV

1985

 

 

train, transit cell, van

14/09/2018 to

28/09/2018

0.4-0.7 m²

 

 

overcrowding, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of safety equipment, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to shower 1,000
47. 54547/18

22/10/2018

Vladimir Gennadyevich ANDREYEV

1967

 

 

train (Syktyvkar – Ukhta) roundtrip

17/05/2018 to

27/06/2018

 

train (Syktyvkar – Ukhta) roundtrip

15/06/2019 to

07/07/2019

 

train, van

05/10/2020 to

11/02/2021

0.5 m²

 

 

insufficient number of sleeping places, no or restricted access to toilet

 

 

 

insufficient number of sleeping places, no or restricted access to toilet

 

 

 

overcrowding, lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient electric light, passive smoking

 

 

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
48. 54682/18

03/11/2018

Zemfir Dilshatovich YUNUSOV

1986

 

 

transit cell, train

29/06/2018 to

27/08/2018

0.2 m²

 

 

overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to running water, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, lack of privacy for toilet Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
49. 54788/18

27/02/2019

Stanislav Eduardovich KRACHKOVSKIY

1985

 

 

train, several occasions of transport

03/08/2018 to

22/08/2019

no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, no or restricted access to running water, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light 1,000
50. 55019/18

07/11/2018

Sergey Viktorovich TKACHEV

1961

 

 

train

17/10/2018 to

19/10/2018

lack of fresh air, insufficient number of sleeping places, overcrowding, poor quality of potable water 1,000
51. 5682/20

10/01/2020

Andrey Mikhaylovich TIKHOMIROV

1988

Zaynullin Vladimir Faukatovich

Tyubuk

van

03/09/2019 to

10/09/2019

0.2 m²

 

 

overcrowding, detention in a single-occupancy compartment, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, lack or insufficient quantity of food, transport during the night-time Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000

[i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *