The case concerns the applicant’s sterilisation in a public hospital without her informed consent.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF PERKOV v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 33754/16
The case concerns the applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention that he was beaten by prison guards and that no effective investigation was carried out in that respect.
Stanislav Lutsenko v. Ukraine (no. 2) (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 Stanislav Lutsenko v. Ukraine (no. 2) – 483/10 Judgment 15.9.2022 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life
Rabczewska v. Poland (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 Rabczewska v. Poland – 8257/13 Judgment 15.9.2022 [Section I] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression
CASE OF VORONIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 51245/20 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention.
CASE OF TIMOKHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 6510/21 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF ISLAMOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 29090/20
The applicant complained of the permanent video surveillance in a post-conviction detention facility. He also raised other complaints under Article 3 of the Convention.
CASE OF RIBEIRO DOS SANTOS AND JEVDOKIMOVS v. PORTUGAL (European Court of Human Rights) 28688/20 and 8655/21
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention.
CASE OF KODELA v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 30000/21 and 9 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF BALOGH AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) 7918/19 and 43062/20
The case originated in applications against Slovakia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)