The case concerns the applicants’ unsuccessful attempts to seek the protection against hostile messaging targeting the Krishna movement and to hold public religious events promoting the teachings of Vaishnavism.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
Colic v. Croatia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 Čolić v. Croatia – 49083/18 Judgment 18.11.2021 [Section I]
M.H. and Others v. Croatia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 M.H. and Others v. Croatia – 15670/18 and 43115/18 Judgment 18.11.2021 [Section I]
Ahmadova v. Azerbaijan (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 Ahmadova v. Azerbaijan – 9437/12 Judgment 18.11.2021 [Section V]
CASE OF OROS v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) 7303/21
FIRST SECTION CASE OF OROS v. SLOVAKIA (Application no. 7303/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 November 2021
CASE OF BALOGH AND ADAMCO v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) 37974/20 and 55887/20
The two applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings pending against them before the Bratislava I District Court.
CASE OF LUTCHENKO AND MALCHYK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 31725/20 and 5904/21
The case originated in applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF TOKAR AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 22356/20 and 7 others
The applicants complained of the life sentence with no prospect of release.
CASE OF AHMADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) 9437/12
The application concerns the planned demolition of a house where the applicant has lived for several years and her planned eviction from that house on the ground that it was an unauthorised
CASE OF PAR AND HYODO v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) 54563/11 and 22428/15
The applications concern the retention by the State authorities of undeclared sums of money seized from the applicants by the customs authorities, and raise issues mainly under Article