Category: European Court of Human Rights

CASE OF OĞUZ v. TÜRKİYE – The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicant on account of his inability to examine an anonymous witness whose statements were used by the trial court to convict him of various offences

On 9 October 2011 the applicant was arrested with a knife in his possession by police officers on a side street, following an illegal demonstration in the Demirtaş district of Mersin. He was released the same day. On 24 October…

CASE OF BELTSIOS v. GREECE – The case concerns an alleged violation of the presumption of innocence under Article 6 § 2 of the Convention and the alleged failure to decide “speedily” on the application for the applicant’s release under Article 5 § 4

In 2000 a contract was signed for the procurement of submarines from the German consortium H.-F. by the Hellenic Shipyards for a total value exceeding 1,3 billion euros (EUR). In 2002 another contract was signed for the repair of submarines…

CASE OF SCHMIDT AND SMIGOL v. ESTONIA – The case concerns the consecutive enforcement of disciplinary punishments against the applicants and the placing of the first applicant in a locked isolation cell as a security measure

The case concerns the consecutive enforcement of disciplinary punishments against the applicants and the placing of the first applicant in a locked isolation cell as a security measure. This resulted in the applicants spending periods of differing durations under conditions…

CASE OF TADIC v. CROATIA – The case concerns criminal proceedings in which the applicant was found guilty of conspiring with several persons with a view to influencing the Supreme Court, by means of paying a sum of money, to render a decision favourable to a well-known politician who was being tried for a war crime

The applicant complained that the Supreme Court, as the appellate court in his case, had not been impartial because of the circumstances surrounding its president, who had testified as a witness for the prosecution. He also complained that the publication…

CASE OF KRACHUNOVA v. BULGARIA – 18269/18

The case concerns mainly two questions: (a) whether Article 4 of the Convention lays down a positive obligation to enable the victims of trafficking in human beings to seek compensation in respect of lost earnings from their traffickers, and (b)…

CASE OF WALESA v. POLAND – 50849/21

The case concerns proceedings in which, following the Prosecutor General’s extraordinary appeal lodged in the applicant’s defamation case, the Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs of the Supreme Court reversed the final civil-court judgment which had been given in…