INTRODUCTION. The application concerns the past disclosure of the applicant’s criminal record information and the amended disclosure regime which entered into force after this Court’s judgment in M.M.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF RIBCHEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 37801/16 and 2 others
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns the questions whether the authorities were required by Article 2 of the Convention, and if so, in what form,
A.I. v. Italy (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 250 April 2021 A.I. v. Italy – 70896/17 Judgment 1.4.2021 [Section I]
CASE OF RUSANDU v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 23047/20
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF RUSANDU v. UKRAINE (Application no. 23047/20) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 April 2021
CASE OF BYELIKOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 57291/19
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF BYELIKOV v. UKRAINE (Application no. 57291/19) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 April 2021
CASE OF ZOLOTARYOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 13399/19
THE FACTS. The applicant’s details and information relevant to the application are set out in the appended table. The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention.
CASE OF FARZIYEV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 63747/14 and 23 others – see appended list
The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. The applicants complained under Article 3 of the Convention of their life sentence with no prospect of release.
CASE OF PASTRAMA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 54476/14
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns the applicant’s complaints that destruction of the Roma encampment where she used to live and the authorities’ alleged failure to conduct an effective investigation
CASE OF TRANSKOP AD BITOLA v. NORTH MACEDONIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 48057/12
INTRODUCTION. The case concerns mainly Article 6 complaints regarding proceedings in which a bus belonging to the applicant company was confiscated based on the finding that its chassis number had been forged.
CASE OF KIM AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 10682/18 and 23 others – see appended list
THIRD SECTION CASE OF KIM AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 10682/18 and 23 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 April 2021