FIFTH SECTION CASE OF ZVARYCH AND MARCHEVSKA v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 3391/17 and 32353/20) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF SAVA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 57351/16 and 6 others – see appended list
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF SAVA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 57351/16 and 6 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
CASE OF KRUPKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 53152/16 and 8 others – see appended list
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KRUPKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 53152/16 and 8 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
CASE OF ALBULESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 25290/16 and 9 others – see appended list
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF ALBULESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 25290/16 and 9 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
CASE OF PANCHUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 14607/16
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF PANCHUK v. UKRAINE (Application no. 14607/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
CASE OF FULGA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 57392/15 and 9 others – see appended list
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF FULGA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 57392/15 and 9 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
CASE OF DUBOVYCH v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 47821/10 and 66460/12
The applicants alleged that their home had been unlawfully searched and complained of unavailability of effective domestic remedies for the relevant complaints. They invoked Articles 6, 8 and 13 of the Convention.
CASE OF MAHMUDOV AND AGAZADE v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 28083/08
The applicants complained under Article 10 of the Convention that their criminal conviction for publishing an allegedly defamatory article had constituted a violation of their freedom of expression.
CASE OF GUMENYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 11423/19
The present case concerns judges of the Supreme Court of Ukraine who complain that they were unlawfully prevented from exercising their judicial functions as a result of the judicial reform and legislative amendments in 2016.
CASE OF BADALYAN v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 51295/11
The application concerns alleged ill-treatment during detention in violation of Article 3 of the Convention and unlawful detention in violation of Article 5.