The case concerns the length of compensation proceedings resulting from the expropriation of a plot of land. SECOND SECTION CASE OF TONNA AND OTHERS v. MALTA (Application no. 3195/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 October 2023 This judgment is final but it…
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF SAZ v. TÜRKIYE – 29218/20 and 2 others
The applications concern the refusal of the domestic authorities to grant the applicants, who were detained at the time of the events, permission to receive visits from their school-age children during the weekends. SECOND SECTION CASE OF SAZ AND OTHERS…
CASE OF ERİŞ AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE – 58665/17 and 44 others
The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror Organisation /…
CASE OF ZAGORSKA v. BULGARIA – 53285/15. The case concerns the confiscation of the applicant’s assets as proceeds of crime
The case is of the type examined in Todorov and Others v. Bulgaria (nos. 50705/11 and 6 others, 13 July 2021), and concerns the forfeiture of assets of the applicant as proceeds of crime. THIRD SECTION CASE OF ZAGORSKA v.…
CASE OF KONYA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA – 37087/03 and 24 others
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF KONYA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Applications nos. 37087/03 and 24 others) JUDGMENT (Revision) STRASBOURG 24 October 2023 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Konya and others…
CASE OF MEHMET DEMİR v. TÜRKİYE – 55569/19. On the control by the prison authorities of documents exchanged between the applicant and his lawyer during their meetings in prison
The application concerns the monitoring by prison authorities of documents exchanged between the applicant and his lawyer during their meetings in prison. In the light of the foregoing, the Court considers that the interference at issue was not “in accordance…
CASE OF MEMEDOVA AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA – 42429/16 and 2 others. The applicants were discriminated against because of their Roma origin
The present case concerns border incidents in which the applicants, all of Roma ethnicity, were not allowed to leave the territory of the respondent State. They complained under Article 2 of Protocol No. 4, taken alone and in conjunction with…
CASE OF A.M.A. v. THE NETHERLANDS – 23048/19
The case concerns the authorities’ final risk assessment prior to the applicant’s expulsion to his country-of-origin, Bahrain. This assessment was made in the context of “last-minute” proceedings, which deal with subsequent asylum applications that are submitted shortly before removal. The…
CASE OF ALTIUS INSURANCE LTD v. CYPRUS – 41151/20
The case concerns the length of civil proceedings and the effectiveness of domestic remedies in this regard. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that, in the instant case, the length of the proceedings was excessive…
CASE OF MYSLIHAKA AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
68958/17 68965/17 68970/17 68976/17 68985/17 68993/17 CASE OF MYSLIHAKA AND OTHERS V. ALBANIA FacebookTwitterLinkedInPinterest