The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention.In application no. 52631/20, the applicant also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF MINSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 33518/20 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF MALTYZOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 18089/20 and 17 others
The applicants complained of the lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
CASE OF SHAPKIN AND MAKOVSKYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 13795/20 and 19927/21
The applicants complained of the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of their detention.
CASE OF RAZGON AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 5386/20 and 5 others
The applicants complained of the lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
CASE OF KHASANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 198/20 and 15 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty).
CASE OF ZAKHAROV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 52784/19
The applicant complained of the life sentence with no prospect of release.
CASE OF SIZOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 43318/19 and 4 others
The applicants complained of the lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
CASE OF TSVETKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 17230/19 and 4 others
The applicants complained of the lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
CASE OF KASZUBSKI v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 15466/19
The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention.