The applicants complained of the various restrictions imposed by the authorities on the location, time or manner of conduct of public events.
Category: European Court of Human Rights
CASE OF IVANOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights)
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention.
CASE OF PALAIA v. ITALY (European Court of Human Rights) 23593/14
The applicant complained that the enactment of Law no. 296/2006 had violated her right, as F.P.’s heir, to a fair hearing under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
CASE OF LYPARIS v. GREECE (European Court of Human Rights) 6047/14
The applicant complained to the Court that the civil proceedings for defamation in which he had been ordered to pay EUR 10,000 to I.G. because of the article he had published in the local press had violated
CASE OF SLÁDKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC (European Court of Human Rights) 15741/15
The present application concerns the ill-treatment allegedly suffered by the applicant while in the hands of Czech police officers, as well as the alleged lack of effectiveness of the subsequent investigation
CASE OF J.N. v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 10390/15
The case concerns the State’s positive obligations to carry out timely proceedings concerning children’s residence and to secure the applicant’s contact rights.
CASE OF RIMŠĒVIČS v. LATVIA (European Court of Human Rights) 56425/18
The case mainly concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention about the lawfulness of his arrest (aizturēšana) from 17 to 19 February 2018 in connection with criminal proceedings against him.
CASE OF ALASGAROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) 32088/11
The application concerns the alleged unlawful interference by the State authorities with the applicants’ peaceful enjoyment of their possessions and raises issues mainly under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.
CASE OF KUPINSKYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 5084/18
The applicant complained that the reducible life sentence imposed on him by the Hungarian courts was converted into a de facto irreducible life sentence by the Ukrainian courts in violation of Article
CASE OF THE KARIBU FOUNDATION v. NORWAY (European Court of Human Rights) 2317/20
The application concerns a complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention from a lessor that was not permitted to increase ground rents as it had proposed.