Last Updated on September 22, 2021 by LawEuro
FIRST SECTION
DECISION
Application no.46523/17
Przemysław PORZYCKI
against Poland
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 5 March 2019 as a Committee composed of:
KsenijaTurković, President,
Krzysztof Wojtyczek,
Armen Harutyunyan, judges,
and Renata Degener, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 20 May 2017,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
1. The applicant, MrPrzemysławPorzycki, is a Polish national who was born in 1975 and is detained in Kamińsk Prison.
2. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Sobczak, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
3. The applicant complained under Article 3 of the Convention about the lengthy application of the “dangerous detainee” regime.
4. On 4 December 2018 and 12 February 2019 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Poland in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay him 3,000 euros (three thousand) to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant, which will be converted into Polish zlotys at the rate applicable on the date of payment. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
5. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 28 March 2019.
Renata Degener KsenijaTurković
Deputy Registrar President
Leave a Reply