Last Updated on September 8, 2022 by LawEuro
The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terrorist Organisation / Parallel State Structure” (Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması, hereinafter referred to as “FETÖ/PDY”), which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt (further information regarding the events that unfolded after the coup attempt, including the details of the state of emergency declared by the respondent Government and the ensuing notice of derogation given to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, as well as the legislative developments that followed the declaration of the state of emergency, may be found in the case of Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, §§ 7‑14 and §§ 109-110, 3 March 2020). All of the applicants were serving as judges or prosecutors at different types and/or levels of court at the material time.
SECOND SECTION
CASE OF BAYRAM AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE
(Applications nos. 20061/17 and 107 others)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
6 September 2022
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Bayram and Others v. Türkiye,
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Pauliine Koskelo, President,
Gilberto Felici,
Saadet Yüksel, judges,
and Hasan Bakırcı, Section Registrar,
Having regard to:
the applications against the Republic of Türkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by one hundred and nine Turkish nationals, whose relevant details are listed in the appended table (“the applicants”), on the various dates indicated therein;
the decision to give notice of the applications to the Turkish Government (“the Government”) represented by their Agent, Mr Hacı Ali Açıkgül, Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Türkiye;
the parties’ observations;
the decision to reject the Government’s objection to the examination of the applications by a Committee;
Having deliberated in private on 28 June 2022,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
1. The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terrorist Organisation / Parallel State Structure” (Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması, hereinafter referred to as “FETÖ/PDY”), which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt (further information regarding the events that unfolded after the coup attempt, including the details of the state of emergency declared by the respondent Government and the ensuing notice of derogation given to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, as well as the legislative developments that followed the declaration of the state of emergency, may be found in the case of Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, §§ 7‑14 and §§ 109-110, 3 March 2020). All of the applicants were serving as judges or prosecutors at different types and/or levels of court at the material time.
2. On 16 July 2016 the Ankara chief public prosecutor’s office initiated a criminal investigation into, inter alios, the suspected members of FETÖ/PDY within the judiciary, including members of high courts, in accordance with the provisions of the ordinary law, on the ground that there had been a case of discovery in flagrante delicto falling within the jurisdiction of the assize courts (further information regarding the orders issued by the chief public prosecutor’s office within the context of that investigation, as well as the ensuing suspensions and dismissals of judges and prosecutors suspected of being members of FETÖ/PDY, may be found in Baş, cited above, §§ 9-10 and 15-21).
3. Following their arrest and detention in police custody on the orders of the regional and provincial prosecutors’ offices, the applicants were placed in pre-trial detention on various dates, mainly on suspicion of membership of the FETÖ/PDY organisation, an offence punishable under Article 314 of the Criminal Code (see Baş, cited above, § 58). The pre-trial detention decisions were issued by the magistrates’ courts located at the respective places of the applicants’ arrest. In the majority of the decisions, it was noted specifically that the criminal investigation was governed by the ordinary rules, given that the offence of which the suspects were accused, namely membership of an armed terrorist organisation, was a “continuing offence” and that there was a case of discovery in flagrante delicto governed by the relevant provisions of domestic law (see Baş, cited above, § 67, and Turan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 75805/16 and 426 others, §§ 30-31, 23 November 2021)
4. According to the latest information provided by the parties, most of the applicants were convicted of membership of a terrorist organisation by the first instance courts, and some were acquitted. It appears that, for the most part, the appeal proceedings are still pending.
5. In the meantime, the applicants lodged individual applications with the Constitutional Court in respect of, inter alia, the alleged violation of their right to liberty and security on various accounts, including the alleged unlawfulness of their detention by reason of the disregard of the procedural safeguards afforded to members of the judiciary in domestic law, all of which were declared inadmissible (see Turan and Others, cited above, §§ 26‑27).
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT
I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
6. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained that they had been placed in pre-trial detention in breach of the domestic laws governing the arrest and pre-trial detention of the members of the judiciary and disputed that there had been a case of discovery in flagrante delicto for the purposes of section 94 of Law no. 2802 on judges and prosecutors and section 46 of the Court of Cassation Act (Law no. 2797).
8. The Government invited the Court to declare this complaint inadmissible for the reasons that they had raised in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 55). The Court notes that the Government’s objections have already been dismissed in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 57‑64) and sees no reason to depart from those findings in the present case. The Court therefore considers that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible.
9. The Court further considers, having regard to its findings in the cases of Baş and Turan and Others (both cited above, §§ 143-158 and §§ 79‑96, respectively), that the pre-trial detention of the applicants had not taken place in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention and that, therefore, there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 on account of the unlawfulness of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention. Moreover, while the applicants were detained a short time after the coup attempt – that is, the event that prompted the declaration of the state of emergency and the notice of derogation by Türkiye –, which is undoubtedly a contextual factor that should be fully taken into account in interpreting and applying Article 5 of the Convention in the present case, the measure at issue cannot be said to have been strictly required by the exigencies of the situation (see Baş, cited above, §§ 115-116 and §§ 159‑162, and Turan and Others, cited above, § 91 and 95).
III. OTHER COMPLAINTS
A. Alleged violation of Article 6 (non-communication of the public prosecutor’s opinion) and Article 8 (registration of letters)
10. Applicant in application no. 53285/19 complained under Article 6 of the Convention of the non-communication of the public prosecutor’s written opinion during the proceedings before the Bakırköy Assize Court, where he had contested some restrictions imposed by the prison authorities. Furthermore, the applicant in application no. 47398/19 complained under Article 8 that the letters he sent from the prison were being registered on the National Judicial Network Server (UYAP).
11. The Court has examined these complaints and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, they do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention (see, for instance, Uzun v. Turkey (dec.), no. 10755/13, §§ 33-71, 30 April 2013, and Günana and Others v. Turkey, nos. 70934/10 and 4 others, § 79, 20 November 2018).
12. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.
B. Remaining complaints
13. As regards any remaining complaints under Article 5 §§ 1, 3, 4, 5 and Article 8 of the Convention, the Court decides not to examine them, in view of its findings under Article 5 § 1 above and its considerations in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 98).
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
14. The applicants requested compensation in varying amounts in respect of non-pecuniary damage. Most of the applicants also claimed pecuniary damage, corresponding mainly to their loss of earnings resulting from their dismissal, as well as the legal costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court.
15. The Government contested the applicants’ claims as being unsubstantiated and excessive.
16. For the reasons put forth in Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 102‑107), the Court rejects any claims for pecuniary damage and awards each of the applicants a lump sum of 5,000 euros (EUR), covering non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on that amount.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
1. Decides to join the applications;
2. Declares the complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention concerning the lawfulness of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention admissible;
3. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the unlawfulness of the initial pre-trial detention of the applicants;
4. Declares the complaint under Article 6 of the Convention regarding the non-communication of the public prosecutor’s opinion (application no. 53285/19) and the complaint under Article 8 concerning the registration of letters sent from prison (application no. 47398/19) inadmissible;
5. Holds that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the applicants’ remaining complaints under Articles 5 and 8 of the Convention;
6. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay each of the applicants, within three months, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on these amounts, which are to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
7. Dismisses the remainder of the applicants’ claim for just satisfaction.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 6 September 2022, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Hasan Bakırcı Pauliine Koskelo
Registrar President
___________
APPENDIX
List of cases :
| No. | Application no. | Case name | Lodged on | Applicant Date of Birth |
Represented by | Applicant’s status at the time of pre-trial detention |
| 1. | 20061/17 | Bayram v. Türkiye | 23/02/2017 | Mehmet BAYRAM 08/05/1975 |
Kadri İNCE | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 2. | 27433/17 | Yaz v. Türkiye | 27/02/2017 | Burhan YAZ 17/03/1968 |
Elif EKİCİ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 3. | 36899/17 | Yalçın v. Türkiye | 16/01/2017 | Ali YALÇIN 01/06/1975 |
Cengiz ÇITAK | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 4. | 40719/17 | Türkyılmaz v. Türkiye | 27/03/2017 | Muhammed TÜRKYILMAZ 04/03/1988 |
Mustafa YILDIZ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 5. | 41664/17 | Karaarslan v. Türkiye | 27/04/2017 | Yavuz KARAARSLAN 13/02/1972 |
Tuğba ÜSTÜNEL ÖZKAN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 6. | 41879/17 | Kopal v. Türkiye | 17/04/2017 | Murat KOPAL 21/01/1981 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 7. | 45028/17 | Erşen v. Türkiye | 26/05/2017 | Serkan ERŞEN 24/07/1980 |
Gökçehan SAĞLAM | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 8. | 46942/17 | Uğurlu v. Türkiye | 15/03/2017 | Mehmet UĞURLU 31/07/1976 |
Mehmet ARI | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 9. | 58972/17 | Alanur v. Türkiye | 20/04/2017 | Hakkı Hakan ALANUR 12/11/1968 |
Şakir HEPİYİLER | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 10. | 61242/17 | Beydili v. Türkiye | 16/06/2017 | Mustafa BEYDİLİ 03/03/1988 |
İmdat BERKSOY | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 11. | 61647/17 | Turgut v. Türkiye | 30/05/2017 | Salih TURGUT 10/05/1983 |
Süleyman DOĞRUER | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 12. | 61652/17 | Varol v. Türkiye | 25/04/2017 | Muhammet VAROL 02/05/1979 |
İlyas TEKİN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 13. | 61970/17 | Demircan v. Türkiye | 26/04/2017 | Mustafa DEMİRCAN 24/08/1976 |
Yasemin DEMİRCAN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 14. | 62720/17 | Pınar v. Türkiye | 28/04/2017 | Mehmet Erkan PINAR 01/01/1969 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 15. | 62773/17 | Gürses v. Türkiye | 28/04/2017 | Uğur GÜRSES 25/01/1987 |
Ebubekir RENK | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 16. | 62774/17 | Arkuntaş v. Türkiye | 10/02/2017 | Mesut ARKUNTAŞ 31/08/1973 |
Sefanur BOZGÖZ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 17. | 63579/17 | Toprak v. Türkiye | 25/05/2017 | Ahmet TOPRAK 21/12/1990 |
Önder ÖZDERYOL | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 18. | 63582/17 | Şahin v. Türkiye | 10/05/2017 | Adil ŞAHİN 12/07/1985 |
Kamile KILDAN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 19. | 63622/17 | Aburşu v. Türkiye | 28/03/2017 | Serdar ABURŞU 20/08/1982 |
Tufan YILMAZ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 20. | 63712/17 | Şişaneci v. Türkiye | 20/04/2017 | Mustafa ŞİŞANECİ 15/05/1983 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 21. | 63740/17 | Köse v. Türkiye | 13/06/2017 | Ahmet KÖSE 27/03/1982 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 22. | 63784/17 | Akkan v. Türkiye | 29/05/2017 | Bahattin AKKAN 10/09/1977 |
Fatih DÖNMEZ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 23. | 66359/17 | Altun v. Türkiye | 26/01/2017 | Recep ALTUN 16/07/1976 |
Mehmet ÖNCÜ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 24. | 66371/17 | Soyal v. Türkiye | 18/05/2017 | Metin SOYAL 01/01/1973 |
Ahmet Can DEMİRCİ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 25. | 70544/17 | Tarhan v. Türkiye | 27/07/2017 | Kadir TARHAN 05/04/1982 |
Fatih DÖNMEZ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 26. | 70628/17 | Özdemir v. Türkiye | 21/08/2017 | Hasan ÖZDEMİR 01/01/1984 |
Ahmet Can DEMİRCİ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 27. | 70857/17 | Güneş v. Türkiye | 08/08/2017 | Cuma GÜNEŞ 17/01/1986 |
Özge ALTINTOP | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 28. | 73516/17 | Çelebi v. Türkiye | 05/09/2017 | Bülent ÇELEBİ 04/04/1974 |
Regaip DEMİR | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 29. | 82865/17 | Ülkü v. Türkiye | 03/11/2017 | Musa ÜLKÜ 30/11/1972 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 30. | 6613/18 | Kayaalp v. Türkiye | 16/01/2018 | Selahattin KAYAALP 15/02/1987 |
Demet YÜREKLİ KAYAALP | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 31. | 14769/18 | Yalçınöz v. Türkiye | 25/07/2018 | Bahadır YALÇINÖZ 19/02/1980 |
Barış ANTÜRK | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 32. | 17830/18 | Aras v. Türkiye | 04/04/2018 | Bahattin ARAS 15/11/1977 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 33. | 20047/18 | Karaosmanoğlu v. Türkiye | 06/03/2018 | Mustafa KARAOSMANOĞLU 15/08/1980 |
Şerafettin AKTAŞ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 34. | 27587/18 | Memiş v. Türkiye | 22/05/2018 | Yusuf MEMİŞ 01/06/1966 |
Esad MEMİŞ | Member of Court of Cassation |
| 35. | 40298/18 | Duran v. Türkiye | 16/08/2018 | Eyüp Murat DURAN 04/02/1977 |
Ali DURGUN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 36. | 52619/18 | Gedikli v. Türkiye | 26/10/2018 | Halük GEDİKLİ 01/02/1969 |
İrem TATLIDEDE | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 37. | 54227/18 | Kaya v. Türkiye | 12/10/2018 | İlhan KAYA 03/08/1965 |
Yakup GÖNEN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 38. | 11804/19 | Şanal v. Türkiye | 22/02/2019 | Osman ŞANAL 10/03/1972 |
Ali ALAGÖZ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 39. | 13253/19 | Çakın v. Türkiye | 26/02/2019 | Akın ÇAKIN 11/07/1967 |
Ahmet Kerem ÇAKIN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 40. | 20941/19 | Gülbaş v. Türkiye | 05/04/2019 | Abdullah GÜLBAŞ 03/10/1983 |
Halil İbrahim GÜLBAŞ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 41. | 23663/19 | Navruz v. Türkiye | 22/04/2019 | Yakup NAVRUZ 05/01/1981 |
Kamile KILDAN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 42. | 24746/19 | Ertürk v. Türkiye | 29/04/2019 | Mustafa Celal ERTÜRK 11/02/1968 |
Oğuz Emre ERTÜRK | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 43. | 27944/19 | Karabacak v. Türkiye | 03/05/2019 | Engin KARABACAK 23/12/1980 |
Ömer Faruk ERGÜN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 44. | 28219/19 | Evğün v. Türkiye | 08/05/2019 | Saniye EVĞÜN 25/01/1984 |
Emre AKARYILDIZ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 45. | 28260/19 | Aydın v. Türkiye | 03/05/2019 | Sami AYDIN 08/01/1973 |
Ahmet OKU | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 46. | 30433/19 | Saatçıoğlu v. Türkiye | 20/05/2019 | Fuat SAATÇIOĞLU 08/03/1984 |
Fatma Vildan YİRMİBEŞOĞLU | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 47. | 30652/19 | Kurmaz v. Türkiye | 16/05/2019 | Harun KURMAZ 01/10/1981 |
Hatice YILDIZ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 48. | 31483/19 | Karpuz v. Türkiye | 21/05/2019 | İbrahim KARPUZ 30/03/1973 |
Ayşe DURMUŞ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 49. | 31513/19 | Temiz v. Türkiye | 31/05/2019 | Ömer TEMİZ 14/08/1980 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 50. | 32201/19 | Sarıkaya v. Türkiye | 29/05/2019 | Mustafa SARIKAYA 03/01/1987 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 51. | 33924/19 | Şahin v. Türkiye | 14/06/2019 | Mehmet ŞAHİN 03/12/1980 |
Nurcan BAL | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 52. | 34034/19 | Akıllı v. Türkiye | 11/06/2019 | İlhan AKILLI 23/04/1980 |
Mustafa SOYLU | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 53. | 34060/19 | Sarı v. Türkiye | 17/06/2019 | Halil SARI 26/03/1990 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 54. | 36029/19 | Çelik v. Türkiye | 25/06/2019 | Hasan ÇELİK 01/10/1984 |
Ebubekir ÇELİK | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 55. | 36037/19 | Bekar v. Türkiye | 24/06/2019 | Mustafa BEKAR 18/09/1984 |
Ebubekir RENK | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 56. | 36331/19 | Aydın v. Türkiye | 18/06/2019 | Fatma Serpil AYDIN 22/07/1988 |
Mehmet Fatih İÇER | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 57. | 36334/19 | Şahin v. Türkiye | 19/06/2019 | İlyas ŞAHİN 01/01/1976 |
Fatih DÖNMEZ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 58. | 36454/19 | Karakaya v. Türkiye | 26/06/2019 | Mustafa KARAKAYA 12/03/1981 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 59. | 36535/19 | Tatar v. Türkiye | 18/06/2019 | Sinan TATAR 01/07/1989 |
Hanifi BAYRI | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 60. | 36918/19 | Kılıçaslan v. Türkiye | 03/07/2019 | Osman KILIÇASLAN 09/10/1978 |
Enes Malik KILIÇ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 61. | 36941/19 | Kara v. Türkiye | 03/07/2019 | Enis KARA 01/09/1981 |
Murat ÇAKAL | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 62. | 36957/19 | Alkan v. Türkiye | 03/07/2019 | Ömer Faruk ALKAN 08/05/1990 |
Rabia ALKAN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 63. | 37541/19 | Cebre v. Türkiye | 30/05/2019 | Ayvaz CEBRE 30/07/1984 |
Ceren ATALAY | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 64. | 38913/19 | Akdoğan v. Türkiye | 09/07/2019 | Şerife AKDOĞAN 09/03/1989 |
Murat GÜNDEM | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 65. | 40674/19 | Zengin v. Türkiye | 20/07/2019 | Ali Osman ZENGİN 26/04/1971 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 66. | 41521/19 | Serli v. Türkiye | 08/07/2019 | Ufuk SERLİ 08/05/1985 |
Sultan TEKE SOYDİNÇ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 67. | 44303/19 | Çekiç v. Türkiye | 09/08/2019 | Mahmut ÇEKİÇ 23/10/1970 |
Ömer NAZLIM | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 68. | 44341/19 | Polat v. Türkiye | 05/08/2019 | İsmail POLAT 15/01/1974 |
İlyas TEKİN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 69. | 44464/19 | Dönmez v. Türkiye | 08/08/2019 | Celalettin DÖNMEZ 15/12/1972 |
Fatih DÖNMEZ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 70. | 44529/19 | Sağlam v. Türkiye | 06/08/2019 | Harun SAĞLAM 15/06/1979 |
Gizay DULKADİR | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 71. | 46185/19 | Kuzgun v. Türkiye | 20/08/2019 | Ersan KUZGUN 13/11/1984 |
Cebrail Eren KAYNAR | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 72. | 46758/19 | Aykaç v. Türkiye | 26/08/2019 | Fatih AYKAÇ 01/02/1975 |
Menekşe Merve TEKTEN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 73. | 47398/19 | Yetim v. Türkiye | 24/08/2019 | Servet YETİM 08/09/1971 |
İzettin DEMİR | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 74. | 47483/19 | Kurt v. Türkiye | 15/08/2019 | Sami KURT 18/02/1978 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 75. | 50697/19 | Ünlü v. Türkiye | 28/08/2019 | Erhan ÜNLÜ 01/09/1967 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 76. | 50704/19 | Demirci v. Türkiye | 04/09/2019 | Osman DEMİRCİ 04/08/1972 |
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 77. | 51002/19 | Takımsu v. Türkiye | 27/08/2019 | Mehmet TAKIMSU 01/11/1983 |
Kamile KILDAN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 78. | 51180/19 | Demirtaş v. Türkiye | 23/08/2019 | Murat DEMİRTAŞ 15/10/1988 |
Hanifi BAYRI | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 79. | 51768/19 | Kızılyel v. Türkiye | 03/09/2019 | Serkan KIZILYEL 10/02/1979 |
Fatih Mehmet ADANIR | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 80. | 51798/19 | Müftüoğlu v. Türkiye | 10/09/2019 | Kamil MÜFTÜOĞLU 10/08/1983 |
Cemal GELİNCİK | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 81. | 52458/19 | Öztürk v. Türkiye | 25/09/2019 | Özcan ÖZTÜRK 16/02/1982 |
Tolga Kaan PATAZ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 82. | 52774/19 | Öztürk v. Türkiye | 23/09/2019 | Hakan ÖZTÜRK 20/03/1983 |
Emre AKARYILDIZ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 83. | 52792/19 | Küçükkaya v. Türkiye | 10/09/2019 | Mukadder KÜÇÜKKAYA 26/02/1978 |
Mehmet MİRZA | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 84. | 53000/19 | Karabidek v. Türkiye | 27/09/2019 | Mehmet KARABİDEK 01/05/1971 |
İrem TATLIDEDE | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 85. | 53078/19 | Karaca v. Türkiye | 02/10/2019 | Yalçın KARACA 01/01/1973 |
Uğur ALTUN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 86. | 53172/19 | Gönen v. Türkiye | 27/09/2019 | Fikret GÖNEN 21/05/1975 |
Yeşim KAYALI GÖNEN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 87. | 53285/19 | Beyazıt v. Türkiye | 20/09/2019 | Arzu BEYAZIT 28/03/1978 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 88. | 53497/19 | Koç v. Türkiye | 09/10/2019 | Ali KOÇ 22/07/1974 |
Hanifi BAYRI | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 89. | 53539/19 | Şahinkaya v. Türkiye | 28/08/2019 | Murat ŞAHİNKAYA 25/06/1982 |
Burcu AKYÜZ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 90. | 53547/19 | Ekinci v. Türkiye | 28/08/2019 | Mehmet EKİNCİ 02/01/1988 |
Atıf DOĞUŞ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 91. | 54194/19 | Demirtaş v. Türkiye | 11/10/2019 | Nidai DEMİRTAŞ 19/02/1979 |
İbrahim Menderes ÇÖLOVA | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 92. | 54226/19 | Güngör v. Türkiye | 25/09/2019 | Engin GÜNGÖR 06/01/1983 |
Elif Nurbanu OR | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 93. | 56008/19 | Kalaycı v. Türkiye | 07/10/2019 | Emrah KALAYCI 01/12/1981 |
Muhammet ATALAY | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 94. | 56175/19 | Avcı v. Türkiye | 23/09/2019 | Sadettin AVCI 04/01/1971 |
Emre AKARYILDIZ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 95. | 56405/19 | Uğurlu v. Türkiye | 17/10/2019 | Hüseyin UĞURLU 01/12/1975 |
Mehmet Fatih İÇER | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 96. | 56568/19 | Sarışık v. Türkiye | 16/10/2019 | Alper SARIŞIK 10/05/1989 |
Hürriyet SÜMER KALA | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 97. | 56778/19 | Okur v. Türkiye | 24/09/2019 | İbrahim OKUR 29/12/1966 |
Mehmet ÖNCÜ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 98. | 57719/19 | Şahin v. Türkiye | 25/10/2019 | Ömer ŞAHİN 05/09/1982 |
Miraç TAMER | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 99. | 58816/19 | Hendek v. Türkiye | 09/10/2019 | Hasan HENDEK 15/01/1972 |
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 100. | 59635/19 | Yeşil v. Türkiye | 07/11/2019 | Ufuk YEŞİL 16/09/1979 |
Merve Elif GÜRACAR | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 101. | 63404/19 | Püsküllüoğlu v. Türkiye | 25/11/2019 | Mustafa PÜSKÜLLÜOĞLU 09/02/1984 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 102. | 64701/19 | Gün v. Türkiye | 05/12/2019 | Hüsnü GÜN 05/05/1985 |
Kübra DEMİRTAŞ | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 103. | 1068/20 | Özdemir v. Türkiye | 17/12/2019 | Erdal ÖZDEMİR 29/09/1981 |
Kubilay PARLAK | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 104. | 2167/20 | Yılmaz v. Türkiye | 10/12/2019 | Ali Çetin YILMAZ 01/08/1976 |
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor | |
| 105. | 2511/20 | Çolak v. Türkiye | 26/12/2019 | Ümit Zafer ÇOLAK 30/08/1974 |
Şeyma SÜMENGEN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 106. | 6245/20 | Ulusoy v. Türkiye | 13/01/2020 | Sinan ULUSOY 11/11/1977 |
Samet CAM | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 107. | 6385/20 | Çakmak v. Türkiye | 09/01/2020 | Ahmet Salim ÇAKMAK 14/04/1988 |
Kadriye TÜMEN | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
| 108. | 9017/20 | Barut v. Türkiye | 24/01/2020 | Mehmet BARUT 27/03/1987 Esra BARUT 09/10/1989 |
Elkan ALBAYRAK | Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor |
Leave a Reply