CASE OF NAM AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 33803/19 and 28 others. The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport

Last Updated on October 26, 2023 by LawEuro

Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose a violation of the Convention (see appended table for further details) in view of its findings in Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), concerning placement of applicants in a metal cage in courtrooms; Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, 22 May 2012, related to the defects in the review proceedings of the detention matters; and Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019, as to the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities.


FIRST SECTION
CASE OF NAM AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 33803/19 and 28 others – see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
26 October 2023

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Nam and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Péter Paczolay, President,
Gilberto Felici,
Raffaele Sabato, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 5 October 2023,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the dates indicated in the appended table.

2. The Russian Government were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS

3. A list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.

4. The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. Some applicants also raised complaints under other Convention provisions.

THE LAW

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

II. JURISDICTION

6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).

III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION

7. The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

“No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

8. The Court notes that the applicants were detained in poor conditions during transport. The details of the applicants’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding cramped and defective conditions during the transit of prisoners (see Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 124-27, 9 April 2019). It reiterates in particular that a strong presumption of a violation arises when detainees are transported in conveyances offering less than 0.5 square metres of space per person, regardless of whether such cramped conditions result from an excessive number of detainees being transported together or from the restrictive design of compartments (ibid., § 125). As regards longer journeys, factors such as a failure to arrange an individual sleeping place for each detainee or to secure an adequate supply of drinking water and food or access to the toilet seriously aggravate the situation of prisoners during transfers and are indicative of a violation of Article 3 (ibid., § 127).

9. In the leading case of Tomov and Others (cited above), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ conditions of detention during their transport were inadequate.

11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.

IV. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW

12. The applicants whose names are listed in the appended table also raised other complaints relating to the issues of the Court’s well-established case-law. These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose a violation of the Convention (see appended table for further details) in view of its findings in Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), concerning placement of applicants in a metal cage in courtrooms; Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, 22 May 2012, related to the defects in the review proceedings of the detention matters; and Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019, as to the permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities.

V. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

13. Article 41 of the Convention provides:

“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”

14. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Pukhachev and Zaretskiy v. Russia, nos. 17494/16 and 29203/16, 16 November 2017), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

1. Decides to join the applications;

2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;

3. Declares the applications admissible;

4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport;

5. Holds that there have been other violations of the Convention under the Court’s well-established case-law (see the appended table);

6. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 26 October 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Viktoriya Maradudina                   Péter Paczolay
Acting Deputy Registrar                  President

——————

APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention
(inadequate conditions of detention during transport)

No. Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

 

Representative’s name and location Means of transport

Start and end date

Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)[i]

1. 33803/19

13/06/2019

Eduard Vasilyevich NAM

1991

 

 

van, train, transit cell

24/12/2018 to

26/01/2019

0.2 m²

 

 

no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, overcrowding, in view of insufficient number of sitting places in a van the applicant had to sit on someone else’s lap or have inmates sit on his lap, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, lack of privacy for toilet Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
2. 33889/19

04/06/2019

Andrey Gennadyevich VINOGRADOV

1970

 

 

train, transit cell, van

20/12/2018 to

24/12/2018

0.3 m²

 

 

overcrowding, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, bunk beds, insufficient number of sleeping places, passive smoking

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
3. 34149/19

07/06/2019

Rafik Samvelovich GAMBARYAN

1992

 

 

train

(Nizhniy Novgorod – Saratov – Volgograd – Pyatigorsk)

13/01/2019 to

19/01/2019

insufficient number of sleeping places

 

1,000
4. 34297/19

13/06/2019

Aleksey Vladimirovich LYSENKO

1978

 

 

train, transit cell, van

18/12/2018 to

17/01/2019

0.3-0.7 m²

 

 

no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, passive smoking, lack of fresh air, overcrowding, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, numerous occasions of transport, mouldy or dirty cell, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of privacy for toilet Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
5. 36494/19

13/04/2019

Aleksandr Viktorovich KOLESNIKOV

1977

 

 

train, transit cell, van

21/12/2018 to

25/01/2019

0.2 m²

 

 

no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding, passive smoking, lack of fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, insufficient number of sleeping places Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
6. 36753/19

19/06/2019

Aleksandr Valentinovich DEMIN

1978

 

 

train

21/12/2018 to

24/12/2018

0.4 m²

 

 

overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of fresh air, passive smoking Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
7. 36768/19

28/06/2019

Vasiliy Vasilyevich LOPAREV

1969

 

 

van, train, transit cell

24/02/2019 to

25/02/2019

0.2-0.4 m²

 

 

overcrowding, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, no or restricted access to toilet, lack or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food, lack or insufficient quantity of food, lack of sleeping places in the transit cell, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
8. 36772/19

25/06/2019

Artur Meruzhanovich MKHITARYAN

1981

 

 

train, transit cell, van

12/01/2019 to

06/02/2019

overcrowding, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, lack or insufficient quantity of food, insufficient number of sleeping places Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
9. 37670/19

04/07/2019

Aleksey Nikolayevich GRAFOV

2019

Vladimir Vladimirovich Koshev

Stavropol

transit cell

09/09/2016 to

14/05/2019

0.3 m²

 

 

lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;

 

Art. 3 – use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms – placement in a metal cage in the courtroom of the Leninskiy District Court of Stavropol, between 02/11/2016 and 22/02/2019

8,500
10. 38438/19

08/07/2019

Aleksey Pavlovich NENIN

1991

 

 

train, transit cell, van

22/03/2019 to

10/04/2019

0.1-1 m²

 

 

lack of ventilation, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to warm water, overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient electric light, constant electric light, passive smoking 1,000
11. 38506/19

28/06/2019

Oleg Igorevich SEVOSTYANOV

1990

 

 

transit cell, van, train

22/03/2019 to

01/04/2019

0.2 m²

 

 

overcrowding

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
12. 44961/19

14/08/2019

Aleksandr Vladimirovich REMCHUKOV

1973

 

 

van, train, transit cell

05/04/2019 to

24/04/2019

overcrowding, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
13. 45243/19

05/08/2019

Ilyas Magomedovich GASANOV

1968

 

 

train, transit cell, van

29/03/2019 to

08/05/2019

0.2 m²

 

 

bunk beds, overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet, poor quality of food

 

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
14. 46041/19

31/07/2019

Denis Igorevich POMYLEV

1993

 

 

train, van

29/05/2019 to

31/05/2019

overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, insufficient number of sleeping places, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, no or restricted access to toilet Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
15. 46119/19

20/08/2019

Yevgeniy Anatolyevich NEDOPOVZ

1975

 

 

train, transit cell, van

29/03/2019 to

26/04/2019

0.2-1.5 m²

 

 

insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of fresh air, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
16. 46309/19

16/08/2019

Seymur Musayevich PAYYZOV

1985

 

 

train, van

03/06/2019 to

07/07/2019

0.3-0.4 m²

 

 

overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of safety equipment inside the van, lack or inadequate furniture, passive smoking, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or insufficient natural light, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
17. 47121/19

27/10/2019

Dmitriy Olegovich ZAPORASHCHUK

1978

Olga Viktorovna Golub

Suzemka

transit cell, van

08/11/2018 to

29/05/2019

overcrowding, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to potable water, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to toilet, lack or insufficient quantity of food, passive smoking, lack of privacy for toilet

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;

 

Art. 5 (4) – excessive length of judicial review of detention –

1. Extension order of 08/11/2018 – appeal considered only on 29/05/2019,

2. Extension order of 29/03/2019 – appeal considered only on 29/04/2019

1,500
18. 47925/19

16/08/2019

Ruslan Murzaliyevich SHANDIYEV

1977

 

 

van, train

21/03/2019 to

10/04/2019

0.1 m²

 

 

overcrowding, lack of sitting places in a van, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, passive smoking, lack of fresh air, no ventilation Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;

 

Art. 8 (1) – permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities – the applicant was subjected to it during his detention in IK-37 and IK-9 Perm Region until 21/03/2019

1,000
19. 48263/19

10/08/2019

Ramil Zakiryanovich NIZAMETDINOV

1984

 

 

van, transit cell

22/04/2019 to

20/05/2019

no or restricted access to warm water, overcrowding, lack of or insufficient electric light 1,000
20. 48546/19

02/09/2019

Oleg Alekseyevich GONOCHENKO

1957

 

 

van, train

29/03/2019 to

22/05/2019

0.6 m²

 

 

overcrowding, insufficient number of sleeping places

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
21. 48803/19

22/08/2019

Temirkan Arturovich KAZHAROV

1986

 

 

train

05/04/2019 to

14/05/2019

lack of fresh air, insufficient number of sleeping places, inadequate temperature, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding, passive smoking Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
22. 49287/19

09/09/2019

Asker Magomedovich MAGOMEDOV

1984

Roman Nikolayevich Petrov

Cheboksary

train, transit cell, van

26/03/2019 to

16/04/2019

0.3-2.5 m²

 

 

insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of fresh air, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, inadequate temperature, poor quality of food

 

 

Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
23. 49780/19

12/09/2019

Shamil Magomedovich TAYGIBOV

1987

Roman Nikolayevich Petrov

Cheboksary

van, train

22/03/2019 to

16/04/2019

0.2-0.4 m²

 

 

overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of fresh air, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, passive smoking Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
24. 50709/19

19/09/2019

Vyacheslav Viktorovich YEFIMENKO

1970

 

 

train, transit cell, van

16/04/2019 to

22/05/2019

insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, poor quality of food Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
25. 51405/19

14/09/2019

Vyacheslav Vyacheslavovich SVIRIDOV

1975

Roman Nikolayevich Petrov

Cheboksary

train, van, transit cells in remand prisons

28/03/2019 to

25/04/2019

0.4-6 m²

 

 

overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of fresh air, lack or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
26. 53075/19

25/09/2019

Shamil Masayevich MAMAYEV

1956

Roman Nikolayevich Petrov

Cheboksary

train, van, transit cell

26/03/2019 to

16/04/2019

0.2-0.3-

2.1 m²

 

 

overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of fresh air, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient electric light Art. 13 – lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000
27. 53316/19

07/10/2019

Sergey Nikolayevich KOVALEV

1969

 

 

van

26/07/2016 to

08/04/2019

0.42 m²

 

 

overcrowding, lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light 1,000
28. 14315/20

08/09/2020

Sergey Aleksandrovich ORESHENKO

1985

 

 

transit cell, van

30/07/2019 to

13/03/2020

2 m²

 

 

applicant transported on numerous occasions, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, lack or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding 1,000
29. 38810/20

14/03/2021

Rostislav Olegovich SHCHELCHKOV

1981

 

 

van

29/12/2020 to

29/12/2020

 

train

23/01/2021 to

24/01/2021

0.4 m²

 

 

overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, lack or insufficient quantity of food, poor quality of food, inadequate temperature

 

insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack or inadequate furniture

1,000

[i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *