CASE OF FROLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 44292/18 and 41 others

Last Updated on December 7, 2023 by LawEuro

The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies.


SECOND SECTION
CASE OF FROLOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 44292/18 and 41 others – see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
7 December 2023

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Frolova and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Lorraine Schembri Orland, President,
Frédéric Krenc,
Davor Derenčinović, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 16 November 2023,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.

2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS

3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.

4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

II. JURISDICTION

6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).

III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION

7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.

8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).

9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.

11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.

IV. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW

12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.

13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention; and Korneyeva, cited above, §§ 62-65 as to the right of the organisers or participants of public assemblies not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence.

V. REMAINING COMPLAINTS

14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under the Convention or Protocols thereto. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.

VI. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

1. Decides to join the applications;

2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants’ complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;

3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints;

4. Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;

5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);

6. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 7 December 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Viktoriya Maradudina                Lorraine Schembri Orland
Acting Deputy Registrar                  President

___________

APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

No. Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location Name of the public event

Location

Date

Administrative offence Penalty Final domestic decision

Court Name

Date

Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant

(in euros)[1]

1. 44292/18

30/07/2018

Tatyana Ivanovna FROLOVA

1949

Sivoldayev Ilya Vladimirovich

Voronezh

Political protest

Voronezh,

07/10/2017

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 5,000

 

Voronezh Regional Court

30/01/2018

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 3,500
2. 1492/19

14/12/2018

Marina Aleksandrovna POLYTOVA

1998

Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich

Novocheboksarsk

Anticorruption rally

Cheboksary,

05/05/2018

article 19.3 § 1 of CAO

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 600

30 hours of community work

30 hours of community work

Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic

15/07/2018

Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic

26/07/2018

Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic

26/07/2018

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings under Art. 20.2 of CAO

 

 

3,500
3. 1504/19

14/12/2018

Ilya Vyacheslavovich YAKOVLEV

1982

Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich

Novocheboksarsk

Anticorruption rally

 

Cheboksary,

05/05/2018

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

20 hours of community work

20 hours of community work

Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic

26/07/2018

Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic

26/07/2018

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 3,500
4. 1609/19

19/12/2018

Anton Alekseyevich MAMKIN

1989

Gaynutdinov Damir Ravilevich

Kazan

Opposition rally

St Petersburg,

05/05/2018

article 19.3 § 1 of CAO

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

7 days of detention

fine of RUB 15,000

St Petersburg City Court

19/06/2018

St Petersburg City Court

19/06/2018

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 05/05/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 – delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal – the sentence of detention was executed immediately, an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect,

Prot. 7 Art. 4 – right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings –

the applicant was convicted under Art. 19.3 and Art. 20.2 of CAO, in separate proceedings, for substantially the same facts relating to his participation in the rally on 05/05/2018

5,000
5. 15865/19

11/03/2019

Nataliya Dmitriyevna VOZNESENSKAYA

1966

Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich

Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou

Opposition rally

 

St Petersburg,

01/05/2018

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court

11/09/2018

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 01/05/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
6. 24461/19

16/04/2019

Grigoriy Sergeyevich GANDLEVSKIY

1986

Kiselyov Roman Denisovich

Moscow

Leafleting to support O. Sentsov

Moscow,

18/06/2018

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court

16/10/2018

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 18/06/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
7. 28537/19

12/05/2019

Mariya Aleksandrovna MENSHIKOVA

1994

Laptev Aleksey Nikolayevich

Moscow

Opposition rally

Moscow,

05/05/2018

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

article 19.3 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

fine of RUB 1,000

Moscow City Court

12/11/2018

Moscow City Court

28/11/2018

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 05‑06/05/2018 escorting to and detention in a police office for compiling the offence reports,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO,

Prot. 7 Art. 4 – right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings – final decisions – 12/11/2018 and 28/11/2018, Moscow City Court; Art. 19.3 of CAO and Art. 20.2 of CAO; overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings with substantially the same facts underlying her conviction in the first set of proceedings

4,000
8. 29719/19

28/05/2019

Alisa Yaroslavovna SAFINA

1996

Kiselyov Roman Denisovich

Moscow

Leafleting to support O. Sentsov

Moscow,

18/06/2018

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court

28/11/2018

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 18/06/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
9. 36536/19

24/06/2019

Aleksey Anatolyevich KHODAKOV

1987

Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich

Velikiy Novgorod

Opposition rally

Moscow,

05/05/2018

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court

18/03/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 05‑07/05/2018 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
10. 37287/19

24/06/2019

Yegor Mikhaylovich AGAFONOV

1997

Zakhvatov Dmitriy Igorevich

Moscow

Rally against the isolation of the Russian segments of the Internet

Moscow,

10/03/2019

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court

18/04/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 10/03/2019 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
11. 42656/19

30/07/2019

Ivan Mikhaylovich ABRAMOV

1985

Yelanchik Oleg Aleksandrovich

Moscow

Rally against the pension reform

Moscow,

06/10/2018

article 19.3 § 1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 1,000

 

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

30/01/2019

Moscow City Court

06/02/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 06-08/10/2018 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Art. 20.2 of CAO,

 

Prot. 7 Art. 4 – right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings – Continued prosecution under Art. 20.2 of CAO after the appeal decision on the charge under Art. 19.3 of CAO, for the substantially same facts

4,000
12. 43554/19

06/08/2019

Aleksey Yuryevich TARASOV

1984

Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich

Vladivostok

Rally for free elections

Vladivostok,

28/01/2018

 

Rally to support A. Navalnyy

Vladivostok,

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

fine of RUB 15,000

Primorye Regional Court

13/02/2019

 

Primorye Regional Court

01/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 27/02/2018 and 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling offence reports,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in two sets administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
13. 46322/19

20/08/2019

Yelena Sergeyevna KALININA

1967

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

 

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 16,000

 

fine of RUB 16,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

07/05/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

07/05/2019

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 3,500
14. 46931/19

01/08/2019

Mikhail Alekseyevich SHAKLEIN

1996

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

 

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 14,000

 

fine of RUB 12,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

14/05/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

14/05/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 15‑16/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
15. 47104/19

01/08/2019

Nikolay Alekseyevich GRIGORYEV

1983

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

 

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 14,000

 

fine of RUB 12,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

28/05/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

13/06/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 19‑21/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports in relation to the rally on 07/04/2019,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
16. 47198/19

12/08/2019

Yekaterina Dmitriyevna TSVETKOVA

1985

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

 

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 12,000

 

fine of RUB 12,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

23/05/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

20/06/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 20‑21/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station after compiling offence reports on 19/04/2019 in relation to the rally on 07/04/2019,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
17. 48382/19

05/09/2019

Aleksey Borisovich GANICHEV

1978

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

 

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

 

 

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 11,000

 

 

 

fine of RUB 14,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

04/06/2019

 

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

04/06/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 02‑04/05/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports in relation to the rally on 07/04/2019,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
18. 48398/19

05/09/2019

Sergey Gennadyevich SYUKHIN

1981

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

 

fine of RUB 12,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

23/05/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

23/05/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 23‑24/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling an offence report,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
19. 48420/19

05/09/2019

Grigoriy Sergeyevich BIYALT

1996

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

 

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

 

fine of RUB 13,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

16/05/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

16/05/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 14‑15/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
20. 48622/19

06/09/2019

Yevgeniy Yuryevich MOLOTOV

1981

Kurochko Yelena Viktorovna

Vologda

Anticorruption rally

Vologda,

14/10/2018

 

Rally to support A. Navalnyy

Vologda,

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

 

3 days of detention

Vologda Regional Court

14/03/2019

 

Vologda Regional Court

11/03/2021

4,000
21. 51013/19

19/09/2019

Yevgeniya Mikhaylovna TRUBKINA

1990

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

 

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

fine of RUB 11,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

23/05/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

23/05/2019

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 3,500
22. 53329/19

18/09/2019

Mikhail Igorevich BARNA

1997

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

 

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

 

fine of RUB 13,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

16/05/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

16/05/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 14‑15/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
23. 53970/19

01/10/2019

Vyacheslav Vasilyevich KABANKOV

1980

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

 

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 12,000

 

fine of RUB 11,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

20/06/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

16/07/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 19‑20/05/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
24. 54040/19

01/10/2019

Darya Dmitriyevna PORYADINA

2000

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

 

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

 

fine of RUB 13,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

16/05/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

16/05/2019

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 3,500
25. 55802/19

10/10/2019

Darya Vasilyevna BOROVIKOVA

1991

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

 

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 13,000

 

fine of RUB 11,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

25/06/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

04/07/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 19‑20/05/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
26. 55914/19

03/10/2019

Oksana Anatolyevna VLADYKA

1974

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

 

fine of RUB 15,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

21/05/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

21/05/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 11‑12/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
27. 56352/19

04/10/2019

Antonina Viktorovna OBEDNINA

1981

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

 

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 14,000

 

 

 

fine of RUB 12,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

25/06/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

25/06/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 19‑20/05/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
28. 56362/19

11/10/2019

Arina Aleksandrovna SKLEMINA

2000

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

 

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 12,000

 

fine of RUB 11,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

23/05/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

23/05/2019

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 3,500
29. 59321/19

31/10/2019

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich TISHININ

1988

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

 

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

 

fine of RUB 15,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

04/06/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

06/06/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 04‑06/05/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
30. 59324/19

31/10/2019

Yuriy Yevgenyevich CHESNOKOV

1966

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

 

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 3 of CAO

fine of RUB 16,000

 

90 hours of community work

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

14/05/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

14/05/2019

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 3,500
31. 59548/19

01/11/2019

Oleg Vladimirovich BOROVIKOV

1994

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 12,000

 

fine of RUB 12,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

14/05/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

14/05/2019

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings 3,500
32. 61179/19

31/10/2019

Arseniy Vyacheslavovich KOSTENKO

1987

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

 

fine of RUB 13,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

23/05/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

23/05/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 18‑19/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports in relation to the rally on 07/04/2019,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
33. 61735/19

12/11/2019

Oleg Vladimirovich LARIONOV

1952

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 14,000

 

fine of RUB 14,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

16/05/2019

 

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

16/05/2019

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 08‑09/04/2019 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports in relation to the rally on 07/04/2019,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
34. 62431/19

20/11/2019

Yegor Olegovich MATOFANOV

2000

Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

A “hybrid” rally against construction of waste incineration plant

Arkhangelsk,

07/04/2019

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

and

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000 Arkhangelsk Regional Court

01/10/2019

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 3,500
35. 16029/21

05/03/2021

Svetlana Borisovna DILMAN

1975

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally to support S. Furgal

Komsomolsk-on-Amur,

29/07/2020

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 20 hours of community work Khabarovsk Regional Court

25/11/2020

3,500
36. 16043/21

05/03/2021

Mikhail Aleksandrovich BARANOV

1987

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally against constitutional amendments

Moscow,

15/07/2020

 

Rally to support A. Navalnyy

Moscow,

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 150,000

 

12 days of detention

Moscow City Court

13/10/2020

 

Moscow City Court

08/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 15‑16/07/2020 and 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports,

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 – delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal – immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect

6,500
37. 16305/21

04/03/2021

Roman Dmitriyevich PICHUZHIN

1977

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally for fair elections to Mosgorduma

Moscow,

03/08/2019

 

Rally to support A. Navalnyy

Moscow,

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

 

30 days of detention

Moscow City Court

04/09/2020

 

Moscow City Court

09/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 03‑04/08/2019 and 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling offence reports,

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the two sets of administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 – delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal – the sentence of detention was executed immediately; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect

5,000
38. 19041/21

26/03/2021

Yelena Aleksandrovna GORSKAYA

1998

Pryanishnikov Aleksey Aleksandrovich

Tomsk

Rally to support A. Navalnyy

Moscow,

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO 10 days of detention Moscow City Court

08/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 03/02/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

5,000
39. 19090/21

26/03/2021

Tatyana Vladimirovna SHADRINA

1985

 

 

Rally to support I. Azar

 

Moscow,

28/05/2020

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 18,000 Moscow City Court

16/10/2020

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 28/05/2020 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,

 

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

4,000
40. 20656/21

25/03/2021

Aleksandr Feliksovich VETROV

1982

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally to support A. Navalnyy

Moscow,

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO 12 days of detention Moscow City Court

09/02/2021

Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 – delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal – the sentence of detention was executed immediately; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect

5,000
41. 20779/21

22/03/2021

Andrey Vladimirovich SUSLONOV

1988

Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich

Vladivostok

Rally to support S. Furgal

Vladivostok,

01/08/2020

 

Rally to support S. Furgal

Vladivostok,

08/08/2020

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

 

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

 

fine of RUB 10,000

Primorye Regional Court

16/11/2020

 

Primorye Regional Court

16/11/2020

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 22/08/2020 escorting to a police station for compiling offence reports in relation to the rallies on 01/08/2020 and 08/08/2020 4,000
42. 21241/21

06/04/2021

Ivan Vladimirovich IGITOV

1979

Shchukin Andrey Yevgenyevich

Nizhniy Tagil

Rally to support A. Navalnyy

Yekaterinburg,

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 30 hours of community work Sverdlovsk Regional Court

18/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – on 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report 4,000

[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *