Last Updated on December 7, 2023 by LawEuro
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies.
SECOND SECTION
CASE OF AZIZOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 51074/21 and 35 others – see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
7 December 2023
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Azizov and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Lorraine Schembri Orland, President,
Frédéric Krenc,
Davor Derenčinović, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 16 November 2023,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
II. JURISDICTION
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
IV. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
V. REMAINING COMPLAINTS
14. Some applicants raised further complaints under Article 6 of the Convention alleging various aspects of unfairness of the administrative‑offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraph 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
VI. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
1. Decides to join the applications;
2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants’ complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;
4. Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
6. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 7 December 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Lorraine Schembri Orland
Acting Deputy Registrar President
___________
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
| No. | Application no.
Date of introduction |
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
|
Representative’s name and location | Name of the public event
Location Date |
Administrative charges | Penalty | Final domestic decision
Court Name Date |
Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant
(in euros)[i] |
| 1. | 51074/21
13/10/2021 |
Yegor Olegovich AZIZOV
1997 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
14/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 2. | 51093/21
13/10/2021 |
Nil Aleksandrovich KOCHETOV
1979 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court
14/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 1.30 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 3. | 51102/21
13/10/2021 |
Denis Konstantinovich DOLGOPOLOV
1999 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 23/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court
26/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 4. | 51112/21
13/10/2021 |
Anton Vladimirovich KUPRIYENKO
1985 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 23/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
14/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 5. | 51254/21
08/10/2021 |
Yevgeniy Alekseyevich VOLKOV
1996 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 23/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court
11/06/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 6. | 51375/21
08/10/2021 |
Roman Vitalyevich GREBENSHCHIKOV
1984 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 02/02/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court
12/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 10.40 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 5.40 a.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 7. | 51408/21
08/10/2021 |
Aleksandr Aleksandrovich FILIPENKO
2000 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
13/05/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5.25 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 12.40 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 8. | 51480/21
08/10/2021 |
Alina Vasilyevna KOTCHENKO
1997 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Bryansk 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Bryansk Regional Court
08/04/2021 |
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 |
| 9. | 52733/21
15/10/2021 |
Aleksandra Aleksandrovna SVESHNIKOVA
2000 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 02/02/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court
16/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 03/02/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 10. | 53159/21
04/10/2021 |
Denis Aleksandrovich VINOGRADOV
1984 |
Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov
Yekaterinburg |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Yekaterinburg 23/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | 20 hours of community work | Sverdlovsk Regional Court
08/10/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 11. | 53160/21
23/09/2021 |
Ruslan Rafisovich DEVYATOV
2001 |
Aleksey Vladimirovich Bushmakov
Yekaterinburg |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Yekaterinburg 23/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | 20 hours of community work | Sverdlovsk Regional Court
15/06/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 01/03/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 12. | 53226/21
08/10/2021 |
Natalya Alekseyevna ARSHINOVA
1975 |
Varvara Dmitriyevna Mikhaylova
St Petersburg |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Samara 23/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Samara Regional Court
08/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 13. | 53231/21
08/10/2021 |
Darya Sergeyevna KOVYRSHINA | Varvara Dmitriyevna Mikhaylova
St Petersburg |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court
13/04/2021 |
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 |
| 14. | 53265/21
12/10/2021 |
Yelena Vitalyevna KUROCHKINA
1977 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally against tree felling
Moscow 27/12/2020 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
12/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. on 27/12/2020 until 2 p.m. on 29/12/2020;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 15. | 53759/21
22/10/2021 |
Valentin Romanovich KANUNNIKOV
1997 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention of 7 days | Moscow City Court
26/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 4.30 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Prot. 7 Art. 2 – delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal – the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. |
5,000 |
| 16. | 53766/21
22/10/2021 |
Maksim Yuryevich GOLYSHEV
1972 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court
26/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 1.30 a.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 17. | 53771/21
22/10/2021 |
Aleksey Vladimirovich KHARITONOV
1995 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
11/05/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 12.30 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 18. | 53887/21
22/10/2021 |
Mikhail Vladimirovich SVECHNIKOV
1991 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Nizhniy Novgorod 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
27/05/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 19. | 53911/21
25/10/2021 |
Savva Gennadyevich GORDEYEV
1983 |
Varvara Dmitriyevna Mikhaylova
St Petersburg |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
26/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 20. | 53961/21
22/10/2021 |
Roman Sergeyevich DMITRIYEV
1991 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
19/05/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 12.30 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 21. | 53976/21
22/10/2021 |
Grigoriy Dmitriyevich SAFRONOV
1985 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention of 12 days | Moscow City Court
13/05/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 3.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021. | 5,000 |
| 22. | 53988/21
17/10/2021 |
Konstantin Vasilyevich SIDOROV
1984 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court
20/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 7.45 p.m. on 02/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 23. | 53990/21
22/10/2021 |
Vasiliy Vladimorovich ARAPOV
1995 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 21/04/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | detention of 9 days | Moscow City Court
07/05/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. on 27/04/2021 until 11.30 a.m. on 28/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Prot. 7 Art. 2 – delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal – the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. |
5,000 |
| 24. | 54110/21
19/10/2021 |
Nikita Vitalyevich FOMICHEV
1999 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 02/02/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
19/05/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 25. | 54224/21
19/10/2021 |
Nurlan Seytekereyevich SULTANOV
1989 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Saratov 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Saratov Regional Court
26/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 26. | 54337/21
19/10/2021 |
Anton Yevgenyevich ANDRIANOV
1984 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
22/04/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 11 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 27. | 54350/21
20/10/2021 |
Andrey Viktorovich ALMAZOV
2002 |
Dmitriy Sergeyevich Dimitriyev
Orenburg |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Orenburg 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Orenburg Regional Court
21/04/2021 |
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 |
| 28. | 54355/21
20/10/2021 |
Pavel Andreyevich ANNIKOV
1992 |
Dmitriy Sergeyevich Dimitriyev
Orenburg |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Orenburg 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Orenburg Regional Court
20/04/2021 |
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 |
| 29. | 54436/21
27/10/2021 |
Andrey Vasilyevich SHCHUROV
1986 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 02/02/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention of 5 days | Moscow City Court
19/05/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 10.40 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 4 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
5,000 |
| 30. | 54443/21
27/10/2021 |
Denis Vladimirovich VASILYEV
1984 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court
16/05/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 11.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 31. | 54446/21
27/10/2021 |
Viktoriya Aleksandrovna DANILOVA
2002 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Kazan 21/04/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of Tatarstan
26/05/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 7.45 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 11.00 a.m. on 22/04/2021. | 4,000 |
| 32. | 54452/21
27/10/2021 |
Pavel Aleksandrovich MURASHEV
1994 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court
21/05/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 11.00 a.m. on 10/02/2021, which is the period over 10 days;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
5,000 |
| 33. | 54821/21
29/10/2021 |
Vadim Olegovich ANISIMOV
1996 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Ulyanovsk 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Ulyanovsk Regional Court
03/06/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 34. | 54824/21
28/10/2021 |
Igor Olegovich ANISIMOV
1992 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Ulyanovsk 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Ulyanovsk Regional Court
03/06/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 35. | 54825/21
28/10/2021 |
Vladislav Olegovich BELYAYEV
1972 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Perm 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Perm Regional Court
20/05/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 36. | 54846/21
28/10/2021 |
Aleksandr Nikolayevich KURAKIN
1986 |
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow |
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow 31/01/2021 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court
09/06/2021 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
[i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
Leave a Reply