Last Updated on January 18, 2024 by LawEuro
The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of nationwide protests against the Russian military attack on Ukraine.
European Court of Human Rights
FIRST SECTION
CASE OF NAZAREDSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 52077/22 and 22 others – see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
18 January 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Nazaredskaya and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Péter Paczolay, President,
Gilberto Felici,
Raffaele Sabato, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 14 December 2023,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of nationwide protests against the Russian military attack on Ukraine. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
II. JURISDICTION
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
IV. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; and Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58‑85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (CAO).
V. REMAINING COMPLAINTS
14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
VI. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
1. Decides to join the applications;
2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants’ complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;
4. Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
6. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 January 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Péter Paczolay
Acting Deputy Registrar President
_____________
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
| No. | Application no.
Date of introduction |
Applicant’s name
Year of birth |
Representative’s name and location | Name of the public event
Location Date |
Administrative charges | Penalty | Final domestic decision
Court Name Date |
Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros)[i] |
| 1. | 52077/22
21/10/2022 |
Sofya Igorevna NAZAREDSKAYA
2000 |
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 26/02/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
21/06/2022 |
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 |
| 2. | 52436/22
21/10/2022 |
Sergey Georgiyevich KOLESNIKOV
1970 |
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 06/03/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court
29/06/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from
4.25 p.m. until 11.50 p.m. on 06/03/2022; Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 3. | 54282/22
02/11/2022 |
Kori MALTS
2002 |
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 24/02/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court
05/07/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 9 p.m. on 24/02/2022 until 6 a.m. 25/02/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 4. | 54431/22
29/10/2022 |
Anastasiya Stanislavovna YAKUBA
2001 |
Baranova Nataliya Andreyevna
Moscow
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 06/03/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court
29/06/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 06/03/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings |
4,000 |
| 5. | 56096/22
10/11/2022 |
Vladimir Yevgenyevich KONSHIN
1981 |
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 27/02/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court
25/07/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 1.35 a.m. on 28/02/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 6. | 56112/22
20/11/2022 |
Nadezhda Viktorovna UTKINA
1986 |
Baranova Nataliya Andreyevna
Moscow |
Anti-war protest
Moscow 24/02/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court
21/07/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.40 p.m. on 24/02/2022 until 2 a.m. on 25/02/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 7. | 56387/22
21/11/2022 |
Daniil Sergeyevich BOROZDIN
1996 |
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 27/02/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court
21/07/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 6.05 p.m.
on 27/02/2022 until 12.30 a.m. on 28/02/2022; Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 8. | 56818/22
09/11/2022 |
Arina Igorevna MAKAROVA
1999 |
Baranova Nataliya Andreyevna
Moscow
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 06/03/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court
13/07/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 06/03/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 9. | 56891/22
08/12/2022 |
Igor Gennadyevich SYCHEV
2000 |
Ushakov Timofey Borisovich
Kokoshkino |
Anti-war protest
Moscow 27/02/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court
15/08/2022 |
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 |
| 10. | 56909/22
01/12/2022 |
Maksim Glebovich MELENCHENKO
2001 |
Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna
St Petersburg |
Anti-war protest
Moscow 03/03/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court
03/08/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 03/03/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 11. | 56917/22
18/11/2022 |
Varvara Andreyevna POPOVA
2001 |
Baranova Nataliya Andreyevna
Moscow |
Anti-war protest
Moscow 03/03/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court
19/07/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 03/03/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 12. | 56927/22
28/11/2022 |
Ivan Nikolayevich LOZHKIN
1985 |
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 06/03/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
29/07/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.35 p.m. until 9.40 p.m. on 06/03/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 13. | 56928/22
25/11/2022 |
Polina Aleksandrovna LEMESHEVA
1994 |
Timireva Olga Vladimirovna
Moscow |
Anti-war protest
Moscow 06/03/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court
25/08/2022 |
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 |
| 14. | 57020/22
13/11/2022 |
Sergey Igorevich KRAUKLISH
1969 |
Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna
St Petersburg |
Anti-war protest
St Petersburg 06/03/2022 |
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court
14/07/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.50 p.m. until 9.15 p.m. on 06/03/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 15. | 57033/22
15/11/2022 |
Anna Mikhaylovna MUKHOYAN
1999 |
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 06/03/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court
15/07/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 06/03/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 16. | 57339/22
19/11/2022 |
Ivan Dmitriyevich MITRAKOV
1993 |
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 03/03/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court
19/07/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 03/03/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
|
4,000 |
| 17. | 57396/22
17/11/2022 |
Olga Dmitriyevna SLUZHBINA
2002 |
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 06/03/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court
29/07/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 06/03/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 18. | 57514/22
17/11/2022 |
Galina Vladimirovna BOBROVA
1968 |
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 06/03/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court
25/07/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 06/03/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 19. | 57517/22
08/12/2022 |
Tatyana Valeryevna DAVIDIS
1969 |
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 27/02/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
15/08/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.50 p.m. until 11 p.m. on 27/02/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 20. | 57546/22
29/11/2022 |
Nataliya Aleksandrovna LAUVE
2000 |
Baranova Natalya Andreyevna
Moscow
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 06/03/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
29/07/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 06/03/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 21. | 57583/22
19/11/2022 |
Mikhail Mikhaylovich STARIKOV
1983 |
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 03/03/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
21/07/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.40 p.m. on 03/03/2022 until 1.30 a.m. on 04/03/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 22. | 57714/22
08/12/2022 |
Yelena Aleksandrovna DOBRIKOVA
1992 |
Ushakov Timofey Borisovich
Kokoshkino |
Anti-war protest
Moscow 27/02/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court
17/08/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 27/02/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
| 23. | 57852/22
21/11/2022 |
Yevgeniy Yuryevich SIMONOV
1977 |
|
Anti-war protest
Moscow 06/03/2022 |
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court
21/07/2022 |
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful detention – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 06/03/2022;
Art. 6 (1) – lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. |
4,000 |
[i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
Leave a Reply