CALUK AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (European Court of Human Rights)

Last Updated on October 3, 2020 by LawEuro

FOURTH SECTION
DECISION

Application no. 3927/15
Nahida ČALUK against Bosnia and Herzegovina
and 63 other applications
(see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 25 September 2018 as a Committee composed of:

Carlo Ranzoni, President,
Faris Vehabović,
Péter Paczolay, judges,
and Andrea Tamietti, Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

1.  A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix.

2.  The first applicant, MsČaluk, was represented by Mr A. Lozo, a lawyer practising in Travnik. The remaining applicants were represented by Ms H. Kapetan, a lawyer practising in Travnik. The Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms B. Skalonjić.

A.  The circumstances of the cases

3.  The facts of the cases, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

1.  The facts submitted by the applicants

4.  By 67 judgments of the Travnik Municipal Court and the Bugojno Municipal Court, the applicants’ employers, various public companies, were ordered to pay them different sums in respect of unpaid work-related benefits together with default interest at the statutory rate and legal costs. The judgments became final between 19 December 2003 and 27 December 2012.

5.  The applicants’ winding-up petitions were rejected on 27 May 2010 and 14 February 2011, respectively, because the Federal Ministry of Energy had refused authorisation (see paragraph 13 below). Consequently, in accordance with the 2003 Insolvency Act, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina became liable for the debts of the applicants’ employers (see paragraph 13 below).

6.  The Sarajevo Municipal Court issued enforcement orders between 10 October 2011 and 27 February 2013, in which the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina was designated as a debtor. They were transferred to the competent bank and were listed among the charges in the federal budget.

7.  On several occasions thereafter the bank informed the competent courts that enforcement was not possible because the budgetary funds intended for that purpose had already been spent.

2.  The additional information provided by the Government

8.  The Government did not dispute the facts submitted by the applicants. However, they provided additional information as follows.

9.  Between 2 July 2013 and 27 November 2014 the applicants complained of the non-enforcement to the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina (“the Constitutional Court”).

10.  On 17 March 2015 (decision no. AP 2892/13) the Constitutional Court found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in the applicants’ cases on account of the prolonged non-enforcement of the final judgments in their favour. It ordered the government of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina to take the necessary steps in order to secure the payment of its debt arising from the final judgments within a reasonable time.

11.  Subsequently, between 16 July 2015 and 25 July 2016, and before the Government were given notice of the present applications (7 September 2016), the final judgments in the applicants’favour were fully enforced.

B.  Relevant domestic law

12.  The 2003 Enforcement Procedure Act (Zakon o izvršnompostupku, Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (“OG FBH”), nos. 32/03, 52/03, 33/06, 39/06, 39/09, 35/12 and 46/16) provides for the limitation of enforcement of final judgments against the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the cantons: these will be enforced only within the amount of funds provided for that purpose in the federal and cantonal budgets which cannot be lower than 0,3% of the total budget (section 138 (3) and (6)). The enforcement will be carried out in a chronological order according to the time the judgments became final. The statutory prescription period does not apply to these claims (section 138 (5)).

13.  Section 5 of the 2003 Insolvency Act (Zakon o stečajnompostupku, OG FBH, nos. 29/03, 32/04, 42/06 and 4/17), provides that a winding-up order may be made against the manufacturers of weapons and military technology with the authorisation of the Ministry of Energy only. If the Ministry refuses authorisation the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina becomes liable for the debts of the company.

COMPLAINT

14.  The applicants complain under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the failure by the national authorities to enforce the final court decisions given in their favour.

THE LAW

15.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to order their joinder (Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court).

16.  The Government submitted that the applicants had failed to inform the Court of the fact that the final judgments in their favour had been fully enforced. They therefore suggested that the Court reject the applications as an abuse of the right of individual application in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.

17.  The applicants did not dispute the facts as presented by the Government. They argued instead that they had intended to inform the Court about the new developments in their reply to the Government’s observations.

18.  The Court recalls that according to Rule 47 § 7 of the Rules of Court applicants shall keep the Court informed of all circumstances relevant to the application. An application may be rejected as abusive under Article 35 § 3 of the Convention if it has been established that (a) it is knowingly based on untrue facts and false declarations (see Drijfhoutv. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 51721/09, § 29, 22 February 2011), or that (b) significant information and documents have been deliberately withheld, either where they were known from the outset (see Puusep v. Estonia (dec.), no. 67648/10, § 32, 7 January 2014) or where new significant developments have occurred during the procedure (see Komatinović v. Serbia (dec.), no. 75381/10, 29 January 2013).

19.  Incomplete and therefore misleading information may also amount to abuse of the right of application, especially if the information concerns the very core of the case and no sufficient explanation is given for the failure to disclose that information (see, for example, Gross v. Switzerland[GC], no. 67810/10, § 28, ECHR 2014).Lastly, it cannot be the task of the Court, a body which was set up under the Convention to ensure the observance of the engagements undertaken by the High Contracting Parties with respect to the Convention, to deal with a succession of ill-founded and querulous complaints, creating unnecessary work which is incompatible with its real functions (see Petrović v. Serbia (dec.), nos. 56551/11 and 10 others, 18 October 2011).

20.  Turning to the present case, the Court notes that following the decision of the Constitutional Court (see paragraph 10 above), the final judgments in the applicants’favour were fully enforced between 16 July 2015 and 25 July 2016 (see paragraph 11 above). The applicants, however, did not inform the Court about that development. The Court notes that the enforcement occurred before notice of the applications was given to the Government and that no convincing explanation for this omission was provided.

21.  Having regard to the fact that the information withheld concerned the very core of the applications, the Court finds that such conduct was contrary to the purpose of the right of individual application, as provided for in Article 34 of the Convention, and significantly impeded the proper functioning of the Court. In addition, lawyers must understand that, having due regard to the Court’s duty to examine allegations of human rights violations, they must show a high level of professional prudence and meaningful cooperation with the Court by sparing it the introduction of unmeritorious complaints and, both before proceedings have been instituted and thereafter, they must inquire diligently into all the details of the case, meticulously abide by all the relevant rules of procedure and must urge their clients to do the same. Otherwise, the wilful or negligent misuse of the Court’s resources may undermine the credibility of lawyers’ work in the eyes of the Court and even, if it occurs systematically, may result in particular individual lawyers being banned from representing applicants under Rule 36 § 4 (b) of the Rules of Court (see Stevančević v. BosniaandHerzegovina (dec.), no. 67618/09, § 29, 10 January 2017).

22.  In the light of the foregoing, the Court considers that the present applications constitute an abuse of the right of individual application within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) in fine of the Convention. They must therefore be rejected pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Declares the applications inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 18 October 2018.

Andrea Tamietti                                                   Carlo Ranzoni
Deputy Registrar                                                      President

 

APPENDIX

LIST OF APPLICANTS

No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant

Date of birth

Place of residence

Nationality

1. 3927/15 15/12/2014 Nahida ČALUK

07/10/1959

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

2. 4783/15 13/01/2015 Enes KRNJIĆ

25/11/1957

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

3. 4795/15 13/01/2015 Ibrahim SILAJDŽIJA

29/08/1949

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

4. 4799/15 13/01/2015 Ismet RIZVIĆ

09/05/1962

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

5. 4815/15 13/01/2015 Namik DUŽAN

27/02/1958

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

6. 4817/15 13/01/2015 Muhamed KERIĆ

10/02/1954

Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

7. 4819/15 13/01/2015 Ibrahim DELIĆ

07/02/1953

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

8. 4821/15 13/01/2015 Adnan ZOLOTA

12/06/1963

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

9. 4824/15 13/01/2015 Kasim ŠILJAK

26/09/1964

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

10. 4826/15 13/01/2015 Edhem SILAJDŽIJA

03/03/1951

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

11. 4829/15 13/01/2015 Fikret ZAHIROVIĆ

28/05/1958

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

12. 4833/15 13/01/2015 Nesib SKOPLJAK

13/03/1961

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

13. 4837/15 13/01/2015 Began HASKIĆ

26/07/1951

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

14. 4841/15 13/01/2015 Vejsil ĐULIĆ

15/02/1951

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

15. 4842/15 13/01/2015 Reflik ČAKIĆ

19/08/1963

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

16. 4848/15 13/01/2015 Sead HASANOVIĆ

08/02/1960

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

17. 4850/15 13/01/2015 Zajim KMETAŠ

10/04/1957

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

18. 4853/15 13/01/2015 Hatidža POKVIĆ

06/08/1963

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

19. 4861/15 13/01/2015 Meho ZUKIĆ

14/08/1968

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

20. 4951/15 13/01/2015 Suvad HODŽIĆ

20/12/1960

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

21. 4952/15 13/01/2015 Đemal KRNJIĆ

23/02/1962

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

22. 4957/15 13/01/2015 Sabahudin HELDA

10/10/1958

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

23. 5817/15 21/01/2015 Miljenka GRIZIĆ

22/06/1957

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

24. 7277/15 30/01/2015 Asim NURKIĆ

04/09/1958

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

25. 7290/15 30/01/2015 Senad HARAČIĆ

29/04/1957

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

26. 7299/15 30/01/2015 Muradif ĆOSIĆ

29/06/1963

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

27. 7305/15 30/01/2015 Mirsada RUSTEMPAŠIĆ

02/11/1951

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

 

28. 7308/15 30/01/2015 Ismet MALKOČ

17/11/1954

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

29. 7323/15 29/01/2015 Sejad ČORBEG

15/09/1951

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

30. 7333/15 29/01/2015 Suvad ZAIMOVIĆ

15/04/1964

Novi Travnik

Bosnia and Herzegovina

31. 7357/15 30/01/2015 Lutvo ĆATIĆ

27/08/1954

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

32. 7425/15 30/01/2015 Senija BRZIKA

30/01/1965

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

33. 7437/15 30/01/2015 Muhamed DAGOJA

18/04/1965

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

34. 7440/15 30/01/2015 Aiša TALIĆ

13/02/1951

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

35. 7451/15 30/01/2015 Bahrudin ĆATIĆ

14/06/1966

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

36. 7488/15 30/01/2015 Asim NURKIĆ

04/09/1958

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

37. 10020/15 05/02/2015 Safet ALIBEGOVIĆ

13/04/1956

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

38. 10035/15 05/02/2015 Hanka DURADBEGOVIĆ

18/08/1957

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

39. 10765/15 23/02/2015 Mirsad MUSIĆ

01/09/1965

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

40. 10775/15 23/02/2015 Rasma KULAS

18/01/1960

DonjiVakuf

Bosnia and Herzegovina

41. 10866/15 23/02/2015 Ramiza ĆESO

01/02/1965

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

42. 10869/15 23/02/2015 Sadija BRČIĆ

21/03/1966

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

43. 10872/15 23/02/2015 Sead GURIĆ

05/09/1960

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

44. 10873/15 23/02/2015 Nurudin JUSIĆ

21/10/1948

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

45. 10877/15 23/02/2015 Enesa PURIVATRA

03/03/1960

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

46. 10880/15 23/02/2015 Sulejman SULTANOVIĆ

30/12/1966

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

47. 10886/15 23/02/2015 Nedžad LAKAČA

14/01/1963

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

48. 10890/15 23/02/2015 Nedžad MANDARA

27/01/1968

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

49. 10895/15 23/02/2015 Nermina TATARAGA

02/03/1971

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

50. 10900/15 23/02/2015 Nurudin JUSIĆ

21/10/1948

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

51. 10906/15 23/02/2015 Safeta HAJDAREVIĆ

25/10/1957

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

52. 10912/15 23/02/2015 Sabahudin MISTRIĆ

19/10/1964

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

53. 10916/15 23/02/2015 Mujesira HUSIĆ

10/07/1961

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

54. 11038/15 23/02/2015 Nadžid KOSTEROVIĆ

28/12/1963

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

55. 11039/15 23/02/2015 Hašim SADIKOVIĆ

02/06/1966

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

56. 11062/15 23/02/2015 Fatima KIŠIJA

03/05/1964

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

57. 11068/15 23/02/2015 Mirsad BATIĆ

02/01/1958

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

58. 11133/15 23/02/2015 Azim VUGDALIĆ

05/01/1961

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

59. 11143/15 23/02/2015 Emir BRČIĆ

31/12/1964

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

60. 11186/15 23/02/2015 Sulejman SULTANOVIĆ

30/12/1966

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

61. 11315/15 23/02/2015 Nađid KOSTEROVIĆ

28/12/1963

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

62. 11348/15 23/02/2015 Fatima KIŠIJA

03/05/1964

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

63. 11359/15 23/02/2015 Sead DAUTBEGOVIĆ

02/04/1968

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

64. 14105/15 04/03/2015 Jasmina ŽDRALOVIĆ

28/02/1960

Bugojno

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *