The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention.They also raised other complaints under the Convention.
CASE OF LEONTYEV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 9262/19
The case originated in an application against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 6 February 2019.
CASE OF MAKAROV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 49715/18 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF BÍRÓ AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 77948/13 and 2 others
The applicants complained of unlawful detention and also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF MYSHCHYSHYN v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 41557/13
The applicant complained of the denial of access to higher courts.
CASE OF DEMIDETSKIY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 50829/09
The case concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment by the police contrary to Article 3 and allegedly unreasonably lengthy and unfair criminal proceedings against him contrary to Article 6 of the Convention.
CASE OF B.Ü. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC (European Court of Human Rights) 9264/15
The present application concerns ill-treatment allegedly suffered by the applicant whilst in the hands of Czech police officers and in a detention facility for foreigners, as well as a lack of effectiveness
CASE OF SUSLOV AND BATIKYAN v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 56540/14 and 57252/14
The case concerns criminal proceedings against the applicants, as a result of which they were sentenced to life imprisonment for aggravated murder: the first applicant for ordering a contract killing
CASE OF JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 35599/20
The case concerns the applicant’s suspension from his judicial duties by the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court which, in the applicant’s submission, did not satisfy the requirements of an “independent
CASE OF LIU v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 37610/18
The applicant complained that his extradition to China would violate Article 3 and Article 6 § 1 of the Convention as – if extradited and tried – he would be at risk of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment;