The main issue in the present case is whether the authorities failed to take protective measures to minimise or eliminate the effects of industrial air pollution in the city of Lipetsk, in violation of the applicants’ right to respect for…
CASE OF BEELER v. SWITZERLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 78630/12
In his application the applicant submitted that as a widower who had been bringing his children up alone since his wife’s death, he had suffered discrimination as compared with widows looking after their children alone, given that he had lost…
CASE OF KRYZHANOVSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 16218/17 and 4 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention.In applications nos. 76701/17 and 21796/21, the applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KRYZHANOVSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 16218/17 and…
CASE OF VOLYK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 8942/17 and 30796/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF VOLYK v. UKRAINE (Applications nos.…
CASE OF SMAGINA AND VLADIMIROV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 41891/15 and 59909/15
The applicants complained of the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF SMAGINA AND VLADIMIROV v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 41891/15 and 59909/15) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 6 October 2022 This judgment is final but it may be…
CASE OF TELEPENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 31763/20 and 21605/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF TELEPENKO v. UKRAINE (Applications…
CASE OF RAMAZANOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 31757/20 and 21592/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF RAMAZANOV v. UKRAINE (Applications…
CASE OF RAMAZONOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 31754/20 and 21598/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF RAMAZONOV v. UKRAINE (Applications…
CASE OF GORBUNENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 23534/20 and 13110/21
The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF GORBUNENKO v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 23534/20 and 13110/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 6 October 2022 This…
CASE OF PERSPEKTYVNYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 9225/20 and 6773/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF PERSPEKTYVNYY v. UKRAINE (Applications…