The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention.In applications nos. 76701/17 and 21796/21, the applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KRYZHANOVSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 16218/17 and…
CASE OF VOLYK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 8942/17 and 30796/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF VOLYK v. UKRAINE (Applications nos.…
CASE OF SMAGINA AND VLADIMIROV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 41891/15 and 59909/15
The applicants complained of the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF SMAGINA AND VLADIMIROV v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 41891/15 and 59909/15) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 6 October 2022 This judgment is final but it may be…
CASE OF TELEPENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 31763/20 and 21605/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF TELEPENKO v. UKRAINE (Applications…
CASE OF RAMAZANOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 31757/20 and 21592/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF RAMAZANOV v. UKRAINE (Applications…
CASE OF RAMAZONOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 31754/20 and 21598/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF RAMAZONOV v. UKRAINE (Applications…
CASE OF GORBUNENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 23534/20 and 13110/21
The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF GORBUNENKO v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 23534/20 and 13110/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 6 October 2022 This…
CASE OF PERSPEKTYVNYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 9225/20 and 6773/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF PERSPEKTYVNYY v. UKRAINE (Applications…
CASE OF PANCHENKO AND GEREGLYAD v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 62266/19 and 30697/21
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF PANCHENKO AND GOREGLYAD v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 62266/19 and 30697/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 6 October 2022…
CASE OF PUSHKARYOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 55770/19
The applicant complained of the lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF PUSHKARYOV v. UKRAINE (Application no. 55770/19) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 6 October 2022 This judgment…