The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF SMAGINA AND VLADIMIROV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 41891/15 and 59909/15
The applicants complained of the lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention.
CASE OF TELEPENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 31763/20 and 21605/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF RAMAZANOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 31757/20 and 21592/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF RAMAZONOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 31754/20 and 21598/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF GORBUNENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 23534/20 and 13110/21
The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF PERSPEKTYVNYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 9225/20 and 6773/21
The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of his detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF PANCHENKO AND GEREGLYAD v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 62266/19 and 30697/21
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.
CASE OF PUSHKARYOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 55770/19
The applicant complained of the lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
CASE OF SUSLOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 46298/19
The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention. He also raised other complaints under the Convention, including under Article 34, having argued that the Government