The applicants are lawyers who declared that they had advanced legal fees in respect of their clients (avvocati antistatari) and who were awarded legal fees through assignment orders (ordinanze di assegnazione) aimed at implementing decisions or judgments issued under Law…
CASE OF UTZERI v. ITALY – The application concerns the non-enforcement of a decision awarding compensation for the excessive length of judicial proceedings
European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 10393/22) The application concerns the non-enforcement of a decision awarding compensation for the excessive length of judicial proceedings under Law no. 89 of 24 March 2001, known as the “Pinto Act” (“Pinto” decision)…
CASE OF UTZERI v. ITALY – 10393/22
The application concerns the non-enforcement of a decision awarding compensation for the excessive length of judicial proceedings. European Court of Human Rights FIRST SECTION CASE OF UTZERI v. ITALY (Application no. 10393/22) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 11 January 2024
CASE OF MALIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention
European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF MALIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 57814/18 and 35 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 11 January 2024
CASE OF KAYUMOVY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 56727/18 and 8 others
The applicants complained of the restrictions on family visits in pre‑trial detention facilities.
CASE OF SAMARUKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 54274/18 and 31 others
European Court of Human Rights FOURTH SECTION CASE OF SAMARUKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 54274/18 and 31 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 11 January 2024
CASE OF GALEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 41539/18 and 50 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.
CASE OF KARGASHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA – 4815/18 and 21 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty).
CASE OF TSYOGE FON MANTEYFEL v. UKRAINE – The application concerns the compulsory psychiatric treatment of the applicant, who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia
European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 29804/16) The application, lodged under Articles 5, 34 and 38 of the Convention, concerns the compulsory psychiatric treatment of the applicant, who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia, following a court order in criminal proceedings…
CASE OF TSYOGE FON MANTEYFEL v. UKRAINE – 29804/16
The application, lodged under Articles 5, 34 and 38 of the Convention, concerns the compulsory psychiatric treatment of the applicant, who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia, following a court order in criminal proceedings against her on a charge of murder.