The case concerns defamation proceedings against the applicant following the publication of an article he had written on alleged judicial corruption and an injunction ordering to take down
CASE OF VADYM MELNYK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 62209/17 and 50933/18
The case concerns the adequacy of the applicant’s medical treatment in detention and his placement in a metal cage during court hearings, allegedly in breach of Article 3 of the Convention,
CASE OF KAGANOVSKYY v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 2809/18
The present case concerns the applicant’s complaints about his confinement in the “enhanced (intensive) supervision unit” of the Kyiv Psychoneurological Residential Institution in the period between
CASE OF O.M. AND D.S. v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 18603/12
The application concerns alleged violations of Articles 3, 5 and 13 of the Convention on account of the applicants’ treatment by the Ukrainian authorities while in the transit zone of an international airport
CASE OF STANISLAV LUTSENKO v. UKRAINE (no. 2) (European Court of Human Rights) 483/10
The present application concerns alleged reprisals against the applicant and the manner in which he was treated by the prison authorities after the delivery of the Court’s judgment in respect
CASE OF RABCZEWSKA v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 8257/13
The case concerns the applicant’s conviction for blasphemous statements made about the Holy Bible.
Timur Sharipov v. Russia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 Timur Sharipov v. Russia – 15758/13 Judgment 13.9.2022 [Section III] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression
Gilanov v. the Republic of Moldova (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 266 September 2022 Gilanov v. the Republic of Moldova – 44719/10 Judgment 13.9.2022 [Section II] Article 5 Article 5-1 Lawful arrest or detention
CASE OF BAŞER AND ÖZÇELİK v. TÜRKİYE (European Court of Human Rights) 30694/15 and 30803/15
The present applications concern the pre-trial detention of the applicants, judges of the 29th and 32nd Istanbul Criminal Courts respectively, at the time of the events,
CASE OF GILANOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 44719/10
The case concerns the applicant’s detention abroad on the basis of an allegedly expired detention order issued by a Moldovan court, as well as his insufficient representation in the domestic proceedings.