The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF DICHKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 33724/14 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF PUZANOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26895/14 and 2 others
The applicant complained of different aspects relating to his detention and, in particular, about permanent video surveillance of detainees in post-conviction detention facility.
CASE OF SOVETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 32992/13 and 12 others
The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF LITVINOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 6890/13
The applicant complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings.
CASE OF BOBRYSHEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 21205/12 and 5 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF HABILAJ v. ALBANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2480/10
The applicant complained of the delayed enforcement of domestic decisions. He also raised other complaints under the Convention.
CASE OF KHRYAPKO v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26190/08
The applicant complained that he had been unfairly convicted of drug offences following entrapment by State agents. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF M.K. v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 24867/13
The application concerns an alleged violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life under Article 8 of the Convention in that a blood test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
CASE OF ZAKARPATSKA OBLASNA SPILKA SPOZHYVCHYKH TOVARYSTV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 65719/10 and 2 others
The case principally concerns the alleged restriction of the applicants’ access to a court under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention following a decision of the Constitutional Court interpreting the competence