The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention and that there was no effective remedy in that regard. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF YEPIKHIN v.…
CASE OF KOZLOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 53267/18 and 8242/19
The applicant complained of excessive length of pre-trial detention, the deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention and about his confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against him. THIRD SECTION CASE…
CASE OF MIRONOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 38503/18 and 3 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty). They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF MIRONOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 38503/18 and 3 others – see appended list)…
CASE OF TOKARENKO v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 30472/18
The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF TOKARENKO v. RUSSIA (Application no. 30472/18) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 7 July 2022 This judgment is…
CASE OF ZVEREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26363/18 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in post-conviction detention facilities and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect. The applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF…
CASE OF STEPANISHCHEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 22911/18. The applicant complained of the permanent video surveillance of detainees in a post-conviction detention facility
The case originated in an application against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 3 May 2018. THIRD SECTION CASE OF STEPANISHCHEV v. RUSSIA…
CASE OF VELCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 63313/16 and 11 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF VELCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 63313/16 and 11 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 7 July 2022 This judgment is final but it…
CASE OF MATA v. HUNGARY – 7329/16. The application concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment by the police and the potentially racist motives behind the incident, given the applicant’s Roma origin
It raises issues of Articles 3 and 14 of the Convention. FIRST SECTION CASE OF MATA v. HUNGARY (Application no. 7329/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 7 July 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the…
CASE OF VISLOBOKOV AND GORDON v. RUSSIA 31578/10 and 6059/11. The applicants complained of the secret surveillance in the context of criminal proceedings
The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”). THIRD SECTION CASE OF VISLOBOKOV AND GORDON v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 31578/10…
CASE OF YERUSLANOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 69591/17
The applicant alleged that he did not receive adequate medical care in detention and that there was no effective remedy in that regard. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF YERUSLANOV v.…