The application concerns the applicant’s complaint that her property was seized for an excessive amount of time, constituting a breach of her right to the peaceful enjoyment of her possessions,
CASE OF AGROKUALITA EOOD v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 18669/19
The application concerns the applicant company’s complaint that because of a wrongful interpretation of the domestic law regulating insolvency proceedings, namely Law no. 85/2014, and in particular Article 42 § 3 of that Law,
CASE OF VLAD v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 1020/20
The application concerns the non-enforcement of court decisions setting the contact schedule between the applicant and his child.
CASE OF LILIAN ERHAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 21947/16
The case concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings in which the applicant was found guilty of drink-driving and in which he was not afforded adequate facilities for the preparation of his defence.
CASE OF LOIZIDES v. CYPRUS (European Court of Human Rights) 31029/15
The case concerns the fairness of criminal appeal proceedings, owing to the alleged failure of the Supreme Court to render a reasoned judgment which was sufficiently clear as to its outcome, in view of that court’s tied vote.
CASE OF DROUSIOTIS v. CYPRUS (European Court of Human Rights) 42315/15
The case concerns a judgment given against a journalist in civil defamation proceedings. The applicant complained of a breach of his right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention.
CASE OF ASSOCIATION OF CIVIL SERVANTS AND UNION FOR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING v. GERMANY (European Court of Human Rights) 815/18 and 4 others
The applications concern the compatibility with Article 11 of the Convention of the Uniformity of Collective Agreements Act (Tarifeinheitsgesetz), which regulates conflicts that arise if several collective agreements
CASE OF BTS HOLDING, A.S. v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) 55617/17
Raising mainly issues under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, this case concerns the non-enforcement against the National Property Fund of Slovakia (“NPF”), the country’s privatisation agency, of an arbitration award made by the International Court of Arbitration (“the ICA”)
Azadliq and Zayidov v. Azerbaijan (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 263 June 2022 Azadliq and Zayidov v. Azerbaijan – 20755/08 Judgment 30.6.2022 [Section V]
BTS Holding, a.s. v. Slovakia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 263 June 2022 BTS Holding, a.s. v. Slovakia – 55617/17 Judgment 30.6.2022 [Section I]