The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist…
CASE OF APOPII v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 32617/16
The case concerns the alleged lack of effectiveness of the investigation into acts of violence committed by private individuals against the applicant. The applicant complained of a violation of his rights under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention. SECOND…
CASE OF TALEVSKA AND TRPCHESKA v. NORTH MACEDONIA (European Court of Human Rights) 11828/16
The case mainly concerns the applicants’ complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that they had been denied the opportunity to have knowledge of, and comment on, the defendant’s submissions in civil proceedings in which they unsuccessfully claimed…
CASE OF KABAR v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 38597/14
The application concerns civil proceedings brought by the applicants against other individuals before the Hazro Cadastral Court concerning a cadastral dispute, in which they argued that a plot of land, allegedly owned by them, had been unlawfully registered in the…
CASE OF M.D. AND OTHERS v. SPAIN (European Court of Human Rights) 36584/17
The application concerns the applicants’ right to privacy and to protection of their own respective image (Article 8 of the Convention) as well as their right to freedom of expression (Article 10 of the Convention). THIRD SECTION CASE OF M.D.…
Grosam v. the Czech Republic (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 263 June 2022 Grosam v. the Czech Republic – 19750/13 Judgment 23.6.2022 [Section I] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Impartial tribunal Independent tribunal Insufficient procedural guarantees in appointment of lay members of disciplinary…
CASE OF KHARLAMOV AND SHCHERBATENKO v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 40959/19 and 19258/20
The applicants complained of the domestic courts’ failure to ensure their participation in hearings in the civil proceedings to which they were parties. THIRD SECTION CASE OF KHARLAMOV AND SHCHERBATENKO v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 40959/19 and 19258/20) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 23…
CASE OF TURCIN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 46051/19 and 14 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF TURCIN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 46051/19 and 14 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 23 June 2022 This judgment is final but it…
CASE OF TRENCHENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 65143/19 and 14 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF TRENCHENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 65143/19 and 14 others – see…
CASE OF DIACONU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 8806/20 and 9 others
The case originated in applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. FOURTH SECTION CASE…