The case originated in applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”). FOURTH SECTION CASE OF APETRE AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 32526/16…
CASE OF POROSHIN v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 70913/12
The case originated in an application against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 26 October 2012. THIRD SECTION CASE OF POROSHIN v. RUSSIA…
CASE OF FARKAS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 33687/21 and 9 others
The case originated in applications against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”). FIRST SECTION CASE OF FARKAS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (Applications nos. 33687/21…
CASE OF HANKÓ AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 17701/21 and 9 others
The case originated in applications against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”). FIRST SECTION CASE OF HANKÓ AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (Applications nos. 17701/21 and…
CASE OF ZAO INFORMATSIONNOYE AGENTSTVO ROSBALT v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 16503/14
THIRD SECTION CASE OF ZAO INFORMATSIONNOYE AGENTSTVO ROSBALT v. RUSSIA (Application no. 16503/14) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 24 May 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of ZAO Informatsionnoye Agentstvo Rosbalt v. Russia, The…
CASE OF PREOBRAZHENIYE ROSSII AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 78607/11
The case concerns the dissolution of the applicant organisation, a public association registered in 2001 in the Kemerovo region and eventually becoming “the all-Russia charitable public organisation ‘Preobrazheniye Rossii’” (charter amendments registered in 2008) carrying out its activities in 65…
CASE OF STROGOV AND KIRICHENKO v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 43387/09
On 10 December 2008 the Kuntsevskiy District Court of Moscow (“the District Court”) convicted the applicants to nine years and six months and to nine years, respectively, for drug-related crimes. The applicants complain that their conviction was unfair on account…
CASE OF SİNAN ÇETİNKAYA AND AĞYAR ÇETİNKAYA v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 74536/10 and 75462/10
The application concerns the alleged breach of Article 7 of the Convention owing to the domestic courts’ failure to apply more lenient criminal-law provisions in respect of the applicants, with the result that their conviction for taking part in the…
CASE OF DOKUKINY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 1223/12
The application concerns the applicants’ alleged ill-treatment by the police and the authorities’ alleged failure to carry out an effective investigation into their complaints. THIRD SECTION CASE OF DOKUKINY v. RUSSIA (Application no. 1223/12) JUDGMENT Art 3 (substantive and procedural)…
T.C. v. Italy (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 262 May 2022 T.C. v. Italy – 54032/18 Judgment 19.5.2022 [Section I] Article 14 Discrimination Revocable and reviewable order prohibiting a Jehovah’s Witness from actively involving his young child, brought up in Catholicism, in…