The case concerns the applicant’s inability to have an enforcement title against a local authority executed and to obtain salary arrears.
CASE OF ROENGKASETTAKORN ERIKSSON v. SWEDEN (European Court of Human Rights) 21574/16
The case concerns a complaint lodged under Article 8 of the Convention in relation to child-welfare measures adopted in respect of X, the applicant’s youngest child.
CASE OF BEŽANIĆ AND BAŠKARAD v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 16140/15 and 13322/16
The present case concerns the applicants’ complaint that the domestic authorities’ decisions ordering them to pay real estate transfer tax had been in breach of their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions,
CASE OF L.F. v. HUNGARY – 621/14. The case concerns the inspection carried out by the representatives of the local government of Gyöngyöspata in the applicant’s home
Download PDF, WORD Document FIRST SECTION CASE OF L.F. v. HUNGARY (Application no. 621/14) JUDGMENT Art 8 • Home • No legal basis for inspections of applicant’s house by various municipality authorities
CASE OF T.C. v. ITALY – 54032/18. The case concerns the domestic courts’ order to the applicant, a Jehovah’s Witness, to refrain from actively involving his daughter in his religious practice
The case concerns the domestic courts’ order to the applicant, a Jehovah’s Witness, to refrain from actively involving his daughter in his religious practice. It raises an issue under Article 8
Oganezova v. Armenia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 262 May 2022 Oganezova v. Armenia – 71367/12 and 72961/12 Judgment 17.5.2022 [Section IV]
CASE OF SIMIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (European Court of Human Rights) 39764/20
The applicant represented the plaintiff in civil proceedings concerning damages. The civil courts upheld the plaintiff’s claim in part. In his appeal on the points of law,
CASE OF LOIRY v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 20425/20
The application concerns the non-enforcement of a final court decision ordering the return of the applicant’s children to the place of their habitual residence, in France. It raises issues under Article 8 of the Convention.
CASE OF CANUDA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (European Court of Human Rights) 4670/16
The present case concerns the applicant’s ill-treatment by police officers during his arrest, which has allegedly resulted in the applicant’s inability to walk; ineffective investigation into
CASE OF PALIY v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 42267/15
The case originated in an application (no. 42267/15) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights