FIRST SECTION CASE OF BESIROVIC AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (Applications nos. 32917/20 and 9 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 10 February 2022
CASE OF GORBACHOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 14693/20 and 4 others
The case originated in applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
CASE OF SELESH AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 432/20 and 3 others
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF SELESH AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 432/20 and 3 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 10 February 2022
CASE OF AL ALO v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) 32084/19
The application concerns the applicant’s trial and conviction in Slovakia on charges of migrant smuggling. An important part of the evidence against him came from the migrants
CASE OF A AND B v. GEORGIA (European Court of Human Rights) 73975/16
The case mainly concerns complaints under Articles 2 and 14 of the Convention about the respondent State’s failure to protect the applicants’ next of kin from domestic violence
Plazzi v. Switzerland – 44101/18 (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 259 February 2022 Plazzi v. Switzerland – 44101/18 Judgment 8.2.2022 [Section III]
Q and R v. Slovenia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 259 February 2022 Q and R v. Slovenia – 19938/20 Judgment 8.2.2022 [Section II]
Roth v. Switzerland – 69444/17 (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 259 February 2022 Roth v. Switzerland – 69444/17 Judgment 8.2.2022 [Section III]
CASE OF BOTOYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 5766/17
The case concerns the applicant’s complaints, under Article 8 of the Convention, that the State failed to comply with its regulatory duties, that failures in her treatment at a public hospital
CASE OF Q AND R v. SLOVENIA (European Court of Human Rights) 19938/20
The case concerns the length of proceedings in which the first applicant requested a foster care permission with respect to her grandchildren, who had been left without parental care.