The case concerns the length of proceedings in which the first applicant requested a foster care permission with respect to her grandchildren, who had been left without parental care. It also concerns an alleged failure of the domestic courts to…
CASE OF JIVAN v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 62250/19
The application concerns allegations that the domestic authorities wrongly assessed the severity of the applicant’s disability, thus depriving him of the possibility of benefiting from a personal assistant, and that the proceedings concerning that assessment had lasted too long. It…
Šeks v. Croatia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 259 February 2022 Šeks v. Croatia – 39325/20 Judgment 3.2.2022 [Section I] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom to impart information Denial of access, on national security grounds, to classified records relating to a sensitive…
Advance Pharma sp. z o.o v. Poland (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 259 February 2022 Advance Pharma sp. z o.o v. Poland – 1469/20 Judgment 3.2.2022 [Section I] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Tribunal established by law Manifest breaches, following legislative reform, in appointment to…
CASE OF ŁAKATOSZ v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 27318/19
The applicant was detained in the course of the investigation which concerned large-scale fraud in four different European countries. Initially, the investigation concerned eleven suspects. On 4 April 2016 the applicant was charged with three counts of fraud. Allegedly, he…
CASE OF RUDNICKI v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) 22647/19
The case concerns the allegedly excessive length of the applicant’s detention on remand. FIRST SECTION CASE OF RUDNICKI v. POLAND (Application no. 22647/19) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 3 February 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.…
CASE OF MALYNOVSKA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 74576/13
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 that she was denied the right of appeal in administrative offence proceedings. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF MALYNOVSKA v. UKRAINE (Application no. 74576/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 3 February 2022 This judgment is…
CASE OF MARKOV v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 66811/13
The case concerns the allegedly unlawful and arbitrary invalidation of the election results in the constituency, in which the applicant had initially been registered as the winner (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention). FIFTH SECTION CASE OF MARKOV…
CASE OF VLASENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 17863/13
The case mainly concerns the prosecution authorities’ access to the applicant’s banking documents, allegedly in breach of Article 8 of the Convention, and a ban on his travelling abroad, allegedly contrary to the requirements of Article 2 of Protocol No.…
CASE OF BILOTSERKIVSKA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 17313/13
The case concerns the alleged breach of the applicant’s passive electoral right (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1) and the lack of an effective domestic remedy in that regard (Article 13 of the Convention). FIFTH SECTION CASE OF BILOTSERKIVSKA v.…