The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF DIȚĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 23712/16 and 18 others – see appended list)
CASE OF DASCĂLU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 2676/16 and 19 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF DASCĂLU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 2676/16 and 19 others – see appended list)
CASE OF POZDER v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 56510/15
The present case concerns the domestic courts’ refusal to reopen criminal proceedings conducted in the applicant’s absence, in which he was found guilty of war crimes and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment.
CASE OF PĂDURARIU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) 37813/15 and 12 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. FOURTH SECTION CASE OF PĂDURARIU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF PIGORYEV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 5757/15 and 5 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
CASE OF VASILENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 70777/12
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF VASILENKO v. UKRAINE (Application no. 70777/12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 13 January 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
CASE OF MANDRYKA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 12991/10
The applicant complained of the ineffective investigation into the death of her son, who died in a road traffic accident. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF MANDRYKA v. UKRAINE (Application no. 12991/10)
CASE OF MARKELOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 42282/06 and 2 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty). THIRD SECTION CASE OF MARKELOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ISTOMINA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 23312/15
The case concerns the alleged lack of justification of the applicant’s detention and the domestic courts’ alleged failure to duly justify the amount of bail, in breach of Article 5 §§ 1 (c) and 3 of the Convention.
CASE OF TABAK v. CROATIA (European Court of Human Rights) 24315/13
The case concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that he did not have a fair hearing because the national courts based their judgments on the opinion of an expert who worked for the defendant…