The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF MARTYNYUK AND KOZMINA v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 9493/21 and 18048/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 13 January 2022…
CASE OF RONTÓNÉ SZÉP AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 390/21
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings. FIRST SECTION CASE OF RONTÓNÉ SZÉP AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (Application no. 390/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 13 January 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.…
CASE OF ECKERMANN v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 52090/20 and 4 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings. Some applicants also raised other complaints under Article 13 of the Convention. FIRST SECTION CASE OF ECKERMANN AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (Applications nos. 52090/20 and 4 others – see appended…
CASE OF CORNEANU v. HUNGARY (European Court of Human Rights) 45021/20 and 9 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIRST SECTION CASE OF CORNEANU AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (Applications nos. 45021/20 and 9 others – see…
CASE OF SAVINOCHKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 39814/20 and 5 others
The applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF SAVINOCHKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 39814/20 and 5 others – see appended list)…
CASE OF ZEJNELOVIĆ v. SERBIA (European Court of Human Rights) 26277/20
The applicant complained of the non-enforcement of a domestic decision given against socially/State-owned companies. SECOND SECTION CASE OF ZEJNELOVIĆ v. SERBIA (Application no. 26277/20) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 13 January 2022 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial…
CASE OF KIRTOK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 26193/20 and 9489/21
The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KIRTOK v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 26193/20 and 9489/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 13 January 2022 This…
CASE OF ARYSTARKHOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 22948/20 and 9 others
The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF ARYSTARKHOV AND OTHERS…
CASE OF BOGUTA AND TERESHCHENKO v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) 13094/19 and 37726/19
The applicants complained of the ineffective investigation into the death of their relatives. FIFTH SECTION CASE OF BOGUTA AND TERESHCHENKO v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 13094/19 and 37726/19) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 13 January 2022 This judgment is final but it may be…
CASE OF KAVKAZSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 76201/17 and 6 others
The applicants complained of the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty). Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THIRD SECTION CASE OF KAVKAZSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 76201/17 and 6 others – see appended…