The case concerns domestic court decisions ordering the applicant to restore a protected building which he had unlawfully demolished. The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
CASE OF CORLEY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 292/06 and 43490/06
The case concerns the enforced departure of foreign religious workers who had been compelled to leave Russia before exercising their procedural rights.
CASE OF TAPAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 24757/18
The present case concerns the failure of the Russian authorities to assist the first applicant in being reunited with her daughters, second to fifth applicants,
CASE OF TURAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (European Court of Human Rights) 75805/16 and 426 others
The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants – all of whom were sitting as judges or prosecutors at different types and/or levels of court at the material time
CASE OF CENTRE OF SOCIETIES FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS IN RUSSIA AND FROLOV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) 37477/11
The case concerns the applicants’ unsuccessful attempts to seek the protection against hostile messaging targeting the Krishna movement and to hold public religious events promoting the teachings of Vaishnavism.
Colic v. Croatia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 Čolić v. Croatia – 49083/18 Judgment 18.11.2021 [Section I]
M.H. and Others v. Croatia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 M.H. and Others v. Croatia – 15670/18 and 43115/18 Judgment 18.11.2021 [Section I]
Ahmadova v. Azerbaijan (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 256 November 2021 Ahmadova v. Azerbaijan – 9437/12 Judgment 18.11.2021 [Section V]
CASE OF OROS v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) 7303/21
FIRST SECTION CASE OF OROS v. SLOVAKIA (Application no. 7303/21) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 November 2021
CASE OF BALOGH AND ADAMCO v. SLOVAKIA (European Court of Human Rights) 37974/20 and 55887/20
The two applicants complained of the excessive length of criminal proceedings pending against them before the Bratislava I District Court.