FIFTH SECTION CASE OF PLETYAK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 11601/19 and 2 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
CASE OF OPANASHCHUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 6426/19 and 2 others – see appended list
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF OPANASHCHUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 6426/19 and 2 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
CASE OF ZVARYCH AND MARCHEVSKA v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights)
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF ZVARYCH AND MARCHEVSKA v. UKRAINE (Applications nos. 3391/17 and 32353/20) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
CASE OF SAVA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 57351/16 and 6 others – see appended list
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF SAVA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 57351/16 and 6 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
CASE OF KRUPKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 53152/16 and 8 others – see appended list
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KRUPKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 53152/16 and 8 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
CASE OF ALBULESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 25290/16 and 9 others – see appended list
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF ALBULESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 25290/16 and 9 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
CASE OF PANCHUK v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 14607/16
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF PANCHUK v. UKRAINE (Application no. 14607/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
CASE OF FULGA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 57392/15 and 9 others – see appended list
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF FULGA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 57392/15 and 9 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2021
CASE OF DUBOVYCH v. UKRAINE (European Court of Human Rights) Applications nos. 47821/10 and 66460/12
The applicants alleged that their home had been unlawfully searched and complained of unavailability of effective domestic remedies for the relevant complaints. They invoked Articles 6, 8 and 13 of the Convention.
CASE OF MAHMUDOV AND AGAZADE v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 28083/08
The applicants complained under Article 10 of the Convention that their criminal conviction for publishing an allegedly defamatory article had constituted a violation of their freedom of expression.