The present case concerns judges of the Supreme Court of Ukraine who complain that they were unlawfully prevented from exercising their judicial functions as a result of the judicial reform and legislative amendments in 2016.
CASE OF BADALYAN v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 51295/11
The application concerns alleged ill-treatment during detention in violation of Article 3 of the Convention and unlawful detention in violation of Article 5.
CASE OF AZER AHMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 3409/10
The application concerns the telephone tapping of an opposition journalist and raises issues, in particular, under Article 8 of the Convention.
CASE OF RECZKOWICZ v. POLAND (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 43447/19
The applicant, who is a barrister, complained that the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court that dealt with her case had not been an independent and impartial “tribunal established by law” and alleged a breach of Article 6 § 1…
Loquifer v. Belgium – 79089/13, 13805/14 and 54534/14 (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 253 July 2021 Loquifer v. Belgium – 79089/13, 13805/14 and 54534/14 Judgment 20.7.2021 [Section III]
D v. Bulgaria – 29447/17 (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 253 July 2021 D v. Bulgaria – 29447/17 Judgment 20.7.2021 [Section IV]
Zoltán Varga v. Slovakia (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 253 July 2021 Zoltán Varga v. Slovakia – 58361/12, 25592/16 and 27176/16 Judgment 20.7.2021 [Section I]
Polat v. Austria (European Court of Human Rights)
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 253 July 2021 Polat v. Austria – 12886/16 Judgment 20.7.2021 [Section IV]
CASE OF YARTSEV v. RUSSIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 16683/17
The case concerns the applicant’s conviction for an administrative offence for shouting slogans during a lawful public assembly that did not correspond to the declared aims of that assembly.
CASE OF AVANESYAN v. ARMENIA (European Court of Human Rights) Application no. 12999/15
The case concerns the applicant’s refusal to perform military service for reasons of conscience and his conviction for draft evasion, and raises issues under Article 9 of the Convention.